Трансформация дискурса как следствие формирования новых эпистемологических полей; Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология; № 47
| Parent link: | Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология/ Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет (ТГУ) № 47.— 2019.— [С. 103-110] |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autor: | |
| Korporativní autor: | |
| Další autoři: | |
| Shrnutí: | Заглавие с экрана Проанализированы процесс трансформации дискурса и появление новых эпистемологических полей. Этот процесс изучен в контексте корреляции лингвистической и вне-лингвистической реальности. Рассмотрено значение динамического объекта в процессе формирования нового знания: схемы познания, ограниченные социальными практиками, развиваются по мере обнаружения ранее неизвестных аспектов действительности, создавая новые интерпретации известных фактов. Discourse transformation as a consequence of new epistemological fields formation is analyzed in this article. The process of discourse structuring from the historical perspective is analyzed on the basis of a historical investigation of a sign and its interpretation represented by Umberto Eco in his work "Dall'albero al labirinto. Studi storici sul segno e l'interpretazione". The process is studied in the context of linguistic and extra linguistic realities correlation. Also, the influence of a dynamic object on the formation of new knowledge is analyzed: cognitive schemes, limited by the society's practice, are developed by discovering unknown aspects of reality, and give new interpretations to the known facts. A metaphor, being one of the factors of new knowledge creation used by a cognizer in different types of discourse, is connected with this process. Among the other issues, the dynamic object, as well as permanent discourse transformation, raises the problem of knowledge falsification that occurs as a consequence of new epistemological fields formation. From the point of view of epistemology, this process is interactive, and may be considered a result of a constant cognizer's interaction with the world. The role of a metaphor in this case is difficult to overestimate. As a metaphor is a tool for creating some new knowledge, it hides the mechanism of its usage from a cognizer. A metaphor gives unusual meanings to the extra linguistic reality; these meanings bring new senses, relations, directions and so on. Metaphor functioning shows that this speech pattern is a compulsory part of semiosis. The object of the research is the reasons and grounds of new epistemological fields formation. The authors suppose that these fields condition discourse transformation. |
| Jazyk: | ruština |
| Vydáno: |
2019
|
| Edice: | Социальная философия и философская антропология |
| Témata: | |
| On-line přístup: | https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/47/11 |
| Médium: | Elektronický zdroj Kapitola |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=660848 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa0a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 660848 | ||
| 005 | 20250408155603.0 | ||
| 035 | |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\30920 | ||
| 035 | |a RU\TPU\network\23868 | ||
| 090 | |a 660848 | ||
| 100 | |a 20191030d2019 k||y0rusy50 ca | ||
| 101 | 0 | |a rus | |
| 102 | |a RU | ||
| 135 | |a drcn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | |a i | |
| 182 | 0 | |a b | |
| 200 | 1 | |a Трансформация дискурса как следствие формирования новых эпистемологических полей |d Discourse transformation as a consequence of new epistemological fields formation |f М. В. Гончаренко, В. Н. Гончаренко | |
| 203 | |a Текст |c электронный | ||
| 225 | 1 | |a Социальная философия и философская антропология | |
| 300 | |a Заглавие с экрана | ||
| 320 | |a [Библиогр.: 12 назв.] | ||
| 330 | |a Проанализированы процесс трансформации дискурса и появление новых эпистемологических полей. Этот процесс изучен в контексте корреляции лингвистической и вне-лингвистической реальности. Рассмотрено значение динамического объекта в процессе формирования нового знания: схемы познания, ограниченные социальными практиками, развиваются по мере обнаружения ранее неизвестных аспектов действительности, создавая новые интерпретации известных фактов. | ||
| 330 | |a Discourse transformation as a consequence of new epistemological fields formation is analyzed in this article. The process of discourse structuring from the historical perspective is analyzed on the basis of a historical investigation of a sign and its interpretation represented by Umberto Eco in his work "Dall'albero al labirinto. Studi storici sul segno e l'interpretazione". The process is studied in the context of linguistic and extra linguistic realities correlation. Also, the influence of a dynamic object on the formation of new knowledge is analyzed: cognitive schemes, limited by the society's practice, are developed by discovering unknown aspects of reality, and give new interpretations to the known facts. A metaphor, being one of the factors of new knowledge creation used by a cognizer in different types of discourse, is connected with this process. Among the other issues, the dynamic object, as well as permanent discourse transformation, raises the problem of knowledge falsification that occurs as a consequence of new epistemological fields formation. From the point of view of epistemology, this process is interactive, and may be considered a result of a constant cognizer's interaction with the world. The role of a metaphor in this case is difficult to overestimate. As a metaphor is a tool for creating some new knowledge, it hides the mechanism of its usage from a cognizer. A metaphor gives unusual meanings to the extra linguistic reality; these meanings bring new senses, relations, directions and so on. Metaphor functioning shows that this speech pattern is a compulsory part of semiosis. The object of the research is the reasons and grounds of new epistemological fields formation. The authors suppose that these fields condition discourse transformation. | ||
| 461 | |t Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология |f Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет (ТГУ) | ||
| 463 | |t № 47 |v [С. 103-110] |d 2019 | ||
| 510 | 1 | |a Discourse transformation as a consequence of new epistemological fields formation |z eng | |
| 610 | 1 | |a электронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a труды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | |a эпистемология | |
| 610 | 1 | |a дискурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a факты | |
| 610 | 1 | |a метафоры | |
| 610 | 1 | |a интерпретация | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Гончаренко |b М. В. |c специалист в области психологии и педагогики |c доцент Томского политехнического университета, кандидат философских наук |f 1973- |g Марк Васильевич |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31768 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Гончаренко |b В. Н. |g Валентина Николаевна | |
| 712 | 0 | 2 | |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) |b Школа базовой инженерной подготовки (ШБИП) |b Отделение социально-гуманитарных наук (ОСГН) |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23512 |
| 801 | 2 | |a RU |b 63413507 |c 20191030 |g RCR | |
| 856 | 4 | |u https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/47/11 | |
| 942 | |c CF | ||