Восприятие творчества Б. Дизраэли журналом "Отечественные записки" в 1840-70-е гг. в контексте еврейского вопроса в России
| Parent link: | Вестник Томского государственного университета. Культурология и искусствоведение № 33.— 2019.— [С. 91-98] |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Autor corporatiu: | |
| Altres autors: | |
| Sumari: | Заглавие с экрана В статье анализируются критические отзывы на творчество Б. Дизраэли, опубликованные в журнале «Отечественные записки» в 1840-1870-х гг., что позволяет изучить реакцию российского общества на политику ассимиляции, проводимую государством в отношении евреев, с одной стороны, и двойственную реакцию российского еврейства на эту политику - с другой. Различные оценки деятельности Б. Дизраэли, изучаемого как пример эмансипированного еврея, раскрывают смену восприятия решения еврейского вопроса в России, прошедшего путь от идей ассимиляции до сегрегации. As a result of the Rzecz Pospolita division (1772, 1793, and 1795) into three parts, the land, where a large Jewish community lived, became a part of the Russian Empire. It leaded to a change of state policy regarding the Jews. The core of this policy was the ideas of emancipation, assimilation and Russian and Jews cultural contacts. To encourage this policy it was tried to reveal new positive examples of Jews' assimilation and emancipation in the European society. The life and activity of famous and influential men were used to be such examples. Benjamin Disraeli, who made not only outstanding career in politics but also was met with recognition from the public as a writer, was used as one of emancipation illustrative examples. During the 19th century his novels were being translated into Russian and were lively discussed in Russian periodical press. The reviews of his novels could help to study the changes in Russian state policy regarding the Jews as well as the attitude of Russian enlightened society to Jews' emancipation in Russia. The reviews published during 1840 - 1870 in the literary magazine “Otechestvennye Zapiski” (“Domestic notes”) are analyzed by the authors. It was the period when Disraeli novels were popular amongst Russian readers and discussed actively in the press of the 19th century. The analysis of the reviews such novels as “Vivian Grey” (1826), “Coningsby, or the New Generation” (1844), “Sybil, or The Two Nations” (1845), and “Tancred, or the New Crusade” (1847) made by different literary critics showed that the evaluation of Disraeli's novels in Russia depended on social and political, economic and cultural factors. The reviews' analysis, made by the authors of the paper is very urgent and illustrative to study the attitude to the Jews in Russia. Initially, in 1840 critics paid more attention to genre distinctness and literacy features of Disraeli novels. The fact that he was a Jew and made a great career was characterized as a successful example of Jews' emancipation. Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса |
| Publicat: |
2019
|
| Col·lecció: | Культурология, теория и история культуры |
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37318825 |
| Format: | Electrònic Capítol de llibre |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=660690 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa0a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 660690 | ||
| 005 | 20250404153553.0 | ||
| 035 | |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\30593 | ||
| 090 | |a 660690 | ||
| 100 | |a 20191002d2019 k||y0rusy50 ca | ||
| 101 | 0 | |a rus | |
| 102 | |a RU | ||
| 135 | |a drcn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | |a i | |
| 182 | 0 | |a b | |
| 200 | 1 | |a Восприятие творчества Б. Дизраэли журналом "Отечественные записки" в 1840-70-е гг. в контексте еврейского вопроса в России |d Reception of Disraeli novels on the pages of "Otechest-vennye Zapiski" in 1840-1870 in the context of Jewish issue |f И. А. Матвеенко, О. С. Хрулёва | |
| 203 | |a Текст |c электронный | ||
| 225 | 1 | |a Культурология, теория и история культуры | |
| 300 | |a Заглавие с экрана | ||
| 320 | |a [Библиогр.: 13 назв.] | ||
| 330 | |a В статье анализируются критические отзывы на творчество Б. Дизраэли, опубликованные в журнале «Отечественные записки» в 1840-1870-х гг., что позволяет изучить реакцию российского общества на политику ассимиляции, проводимую государством в отношении евреев, с одной стороны, и двойственную реакцию российского еврейства на эту политику - с другой. Различные оценки деятельности Б. Дизраэли, изучаемого как пример эмансипированного еврея, раскрывают смену восприятия решения еврейского вопроса в России, прошедшего путь от идей ассимиляции до сегрегации. | ||
| 330 | |a As a result of the Rzecz Pospolita division (1772, 1793, and 1795) into three parts, the land, where a large Jewish community lived, became a part of the Russian Empire. It leaded to a change of state policy regarding the Jews. The core of this policy was the ideas of emancipation, assimilation and Russian and Jews cultural contacts. To encourage this policy it was tried to reveal new positive examples of Jews' assimilation and emancipation in the European society. The life and activity of famous and influential men were used to be such examples. Benjamin Disraeli, who made not only outstanding career in politics but also was met with recognition from the public as a writer, was used as one of emancipation illustrative examples. During the 19th century his novels were being translated into Russian and were lively discussed in Russian periodical press. The reviews of his novels could help to study the changes in Russian state policy regarding the Jews as well as the attitude of Russian enlightened society to Jews' emancipation in Russia. The reviews published during 1840 - 1870 in the literary magazine “Otechestvennye Zapiski” (“Domestic notes”) are analyzed by the authors. It was the period when Disraeli novels were popular amongst Russian readers and discussed actively in the press of the 19th century. The analysis of the reviews such novels as “Vivian Grey” (1826), “Coningsby, or the New Generation” (1844), “Sybil, or The Two Nations” (1845), and “Tancred, or the New Crusade” (1847) made by different literary critics showed that the evaluation of Disraeli's novels in Russia depended on social and political, economic and cultural factors. The reviews' analysis, made by the authors of the paper is very urgent and illustrative to study the attitude to the Jews in Russia. Initially, in 1840 critics paid more attention to genre distinctness and literacy features of Disraeli novels. The fact that he was a Jew and made a great career was characterized as a successful example of Jews' emancipation. | ||
| 333 | |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса | ||
| 461 | |t Вестник Томского государственного университета. Культурология и искусствоведение | ||
| 463 | |t № 33 |v [С. 91-98] |d 2019 | ||
| 510 | 1 | |a Reception of Disraeli novels on the pages of "Otechest-vennye Zapiski" in 1840-1870 in the context of Jewish issue |z eng | |
| 610 | 1 | |a электронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a труды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | |a отзывы | |
| 610 | 1 | |a рецензии | |
| 610 | 1 | |a творчество | |
| 610 | 1 | |a еврейский вопрос | |
| 610 | 1 | |a эмансипация | |
| 610 | 1 | |a ассимиляция | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Матвеенко |b И. А. |c лингвист |c профессор Томского политехнического университета, доктор филологических наук |f 1967- |g Ирина Алексеевна |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\27693 |9 12767 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Хрулёва |b О. С. |g Оксана Сергеевна | |
| 712 | 0 | 2 | |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет |b Школа базовой инженерной подготовки |b Отделение иностранных языков |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23510 |
| 801 | 2 | |a RU |b 63413507 |c 20191002 |g RCR | |
| 856 | 4 | |u https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37318825 | |
| 942 | |c CF | ||