Экспертное знание в обществе порожденного риска: концептуальный аспект
| Parent link: | Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология/ Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет (ТГУ) № 43.— 2018.— [С. 69-79] |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Corporate Author: | |
| Summary: | Заглавие с экрана Риск представлен в качестве характерной особенности устойчивого развития. Общество знания интерпретировано как общество порожденного риска. Раскрыта роль экспертного знания в процессах принятия решений. Обозначены формы интеграции науки в общественные структуры и новая роль науки в прагматике принятия решений. Раскрыта роль процедурной рациональности в выработке обоснованных экспертных решений в обществе порожденного риска. The knowledge society is interpreted as a society of generated risk in the article. The role of expert knowledge in decision-making processes is disclosed. Forms of integration of science into social structures and the new role of science in the pragmatics of decision-making are indicated. The role of procedural rationality in the development of justified expert decisions in the generated risk society is disclosed. To adequately assess the risks, it is necessary to address the possibilities of expert knowledge. A characteristic feature of the knowledge society as a society of generated risk is the expanded scope of democratic procedures for participation in decision-making. The problem of responsibility is shown in the priority positions. In the article, the author shows that the situation of the growing politicisation of science inevitably leads to the idea of the need for a stage of "expert examination", the formation of groups of "symbolic analysts" to conduct additional expert activities that allow reducing risks. The problem of the undeveloped methodology of "expert examination" is indicated as unsolved. The need to address the context and potential of new rationality is revealed. The methodology of an effective expert solution should be oriented towards the potential of procedural rationality. The thesis is substantiated that procedural rationality is based on reflection and a rationally planned attitude towards errors (the method of rationally planned problems and mistakes). The culture of decision-making is interpreted as a constituent and condition of procedural rationality. It is procedural rationality that makes it possible to assess the quality of the solution before the expert decision finds its application. Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35424555 http://journals.tsu.ru/philosophy/&journal_page=archive&id=1723&article_id=38509 |
| Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=660254 |
| Summary: | Заглавие с экрана Риск представлен в качестве характерной особенности устойчивого развития. Общество знания интерпретировано как общество порожденного риска. Раскрыта роль экспертного знания в процессах принятия решений. Обозначены формы интеграции науки в общественные структуры и новая роль науки в прагматике принятия решений. Раскрыта роль процедурной рациональности в выработке обоснованных экспертных решений в обществе порожденного риска. The knowledge society is interpreted as a society of generated risk in the article. The role of expert knowledge in decision-making processes is disclosed. Forms of integration of science into social structures and the new role of science in the pragmatics of decision-making are indicated. The role of procedural rationality in the development of justified expert decisions in the generated risk society is disclosed. To adequately assess the risks, it is necessary to address the possibilities of expert knowledge. A characteristic feature of the knowledge society as a society of generated risk is the expanded scope of democratic procedures for participation in decision-making. The problem of responsibility is shown in the priority positions. In the article, the author shows that the situation of the growing politicisation of science inevitably leads to the idea of the need for a stage of "expert examination", the formation of groups of "symbolic analysts" to conduct additional expert activities that allow reducing risks. The problem of the undeveloped methodology of "expert examination" is indicated as unsolved. The need to address the context and potential of new rationality is revealed. The methodology of an effective expert solution should be oriented towards the potential of procedural rationality. The thesis is substantiated that procedural rationality is based on reflection and a rationally planned attitude towards errors (the method of rationally planned problems and mistakes). The culture of decision-making is interpreted as a constituent and condition of procedural rationality. It is procedural rationality that makes it possible to assess the quality of the solution before the expert decision finds its application. Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса |
|---|