Confrontation And Tolerance Of Cultures: Pro Et Contra; The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS); Vol. 35 : Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences (RPTSS 2017)

Bibliografske podrobnosti
Parent link:The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS)
Vol. 35 : Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences (RPTSS 2017).— 2018.— [P. 799-805]
Glavni avtor: Kokarevich M. N.
Korporativna značnica: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Школа базовой инженерной подготовки Отделение иностранных языков
Drugi avtorji: Lankin V. G., Lysunets (Lysuneth) T. B. Tatiana Borisovna
Izvleček:Title screen
The article presents the idea that the modern cultural-historical realities as the form of co-existence of separate cultures are, at one and the same time, the area of tolerance and the area of confrontational cross-cultural interactions. The tolerant character of the cross-cultural interactions is ontologically determined by the complementarity of cultures with harmonious mentalities. Their mentalities prompt these cultures to enter the enculturational and transculturational interactions. The tolerant character of cross-cultural interactions prevails as the modern cultural area is predominated by the cultures with a harmonious paradigm core. This core presents a well-proportioned entity of cultural and civilizational values that makes them potentially complementary, capable for modifications and interactions without the loss of cultural identity. Confrontation, as the fact of cultural interaction, is ontologically determined by the non-complementarity of the value basis of certain cultures, the inharmonicity of their mental basis with the predominance of self-exclusiveness. The ontological bases of such cultures incline them to the clashes of counterculturational interactions. Such counterculturational interactions are typical, as a whole, to the history of cross-cultural relationships. The fact of the world’s “narrowing”, the constant interaction of cultures at the level of a person, a group, governmental units are the realities of the modern world. This leads to the reaction opposite to the mega-synthesis; to the cultural self-identity growth, to the situational counterculturation. Whereas the situational counterculturation as the response to the global challenges does not necessarily bear the confrontation character provided that the principle of cultures equality is followed.
Jezik:angleščina
Izdano: 2018
Teme:
Online dostop:http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.02.94
http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/53273
Format: Elektronski Book Chapter
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=660234

MARC

LEADER 00000nla2a2200000 4500
001 660234
005 20240122095722.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\29305 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\29304 
090 |a 660234 
100 |a 20190515a2018 k y0engy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a CH 
105 |a y z 100zy 
135 |a drgn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Confrontation And Tolerance Of Cultures: Pro Et Contra  |f M. N. Kokarevich, V. G. Lankin, T. B. Lysunets 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: p. 805 (15 tit.)] 
330 |a The article presents the idea that the modern cultural-historical realities as the form of co-existence of separate cultures are, at one and the same time, the area of tolerance and the area of confrontational cross-cultural interactions. The tolerant character of the cross-cultural interactions is ontologically determined by the complementarity of cultures with harmonious mentalities. Their mentalities prompt these cultures to enter the enculturational and transculturational interactions. The tolerant character of cross-cultural interactions prevails as the modern cultural area is predominated by the cultures with a harmonious paradigm core. This core presents a well-proportioned entity of cultural and civilizational values that makes them potentially complementary, capable for modifications and interactions without the loss of cultural identity. Confrontation, as the fact of cultural interaction, is ontologically determined by the non-complementarity of the value basis of certain cultures, the inharmonicity of their mental basis with the predominance of self-exclusiveness. The ontological bases of such cultures incline them to the clashes of counterculturational interactions. Such counterculturational interactions are typical, as a whole, to the history of cross-cultural relationships. The fact of the world’s “narrowing”, the constant interaction of cultures at the level of a person, a group, governmental units are the realities of the modern world. This leads to the reaction opposite to the mega-synthesis; to the cultural self-identity growth, to the situational counterculturation. Whereas the situational counterculturation as the response to the global challenges does not necessarily bear the confrontation character provided that the principle of cultures equality is followed. 
461 0 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\11959  |t The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS) 
463 0 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\29259  |t Vol. 35 : Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences (RPTSS 2017)  |o International Conference, 18-21 May 2017, Tomsk, Russia  |o [proceedings]  |f National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU) ; eds. I. B. Ardashkin [et al.]  |v [P. 799-805]  |d 2018 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a cross-cultural interactions 
610 1 |a enculturation 
610 1 |a transculturation 
610 1 |a counterculturation 
610 1 |a tolerance 
610 1 |a confrontation 
610 1 |a межкультурные взаимодействия 
610 1 |a толерантность 
610 1 |a конфронтация 
610 1 |a менталитет 
700 1 |a Kokarevich  |b M. N. 
701 1 |a Lankin  |b V. G. 
701 1 |a Lysunets (Lysuneth)  |b T. B.  |c Linguist  |c Senior Lecturer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1976-  |g Tatiana Borisovna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33128  |9 16949 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Школа базовой инженерной подготовки  |b Отделение иностранных языков  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23510 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20190517  |g RCR 
856 4 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.02.94 
856 4 |u http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/53273 
942 |c CF