Experimental study of the γp→π0ηp reaction with the A2 setup at the Mainz Microtron; Physical Review C; Vol. 97, iss. 5

Chi tiết về thư mục
Parent link:Physical Review C
Vol. 97, iss. 5.— 2018.— [055212, 11 р.]
Tác giả của công ty: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Исследовательская школа физики высокоэнергетических процессов
Tác giả khác: Sokhoyan V., Prakhov S., Fiks (Fix) A. I. Alexander Ivanovich, Abt S.
Tóm tắt:Title screen
The data available from the A2 Collaboration at MAMI were analyzed to select the γp→π0ηp reaction on an event-by-event basis, which allows for partial-wave analyses of three-body final states to obtain more reliable results, compared to fits to measured distributions. These data provide the world's best statistical accuracy in the energy range from threshold to Eγ=1.45 GeV, allowing a finer energy binning in the measurement of all observables needed for understanding the reaction dynamics. The results obtained for the measured observables are compared to existing models, and the impact from the new data is checked by the fit with the revised Mainz model.
Ngôn ngữ:Tiếng Anh
Được phát hành: 2018
Những chủ đề:
Truy cập trực tuyến:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.055212
Định dạng: Điện tử Chương của sách
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=660080
Miêu tả
Tóm tắt:Title screen
The data available from the A2 Collaboration at MAMI were analyzed to select the γp→π0ηp reaction on an event-by-event basis, which allows for partial-wave analyses of three-body final states to obtain more reliable results, compared to fits to measured distributions. These data provide the world's best statistical accuracy in the energy range from threshold to Eγ=1.45 GeV, allowing a finer energy binning in the measurement of all observables needed for understanding the reaction dynamics. The results obtained for the measured observables are compared to existing models, and the impact from the new data is checked by the fit with the revised Mainz model.
DOI:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.055212