Characterizing impact damage in GFRP/CFRP composites by determining thermal effusivity/diffusivity; Measurement Science and Technology; Vol. 28, iss 3 : Special Feature on Nondestructive Evaluation of Materials
| Parent link: | Measurement Science and Technology Vol. 28, iss 3 : Special Feature on Nondestructive Evaluation of Materials.— 2019.— [034003, 11 p.] |
|---|---|
| Enti autori: | , |
| Altri autori: | , , , , |
| Riassunto: | Title screen Local variations of thermal effusivity and diffusivity are suggested as indicators of severity of impact damage in composites. A relative variation of diffusivity is a unique parameter of composite quality, while relative variations of apparent effusivity are time-dependent in non-adiabatic samples heated with a square pulse thus requiring a proper choice of optimum observation time. In this study, 36 samples made of glass-fiber-reinforced plastic and 54 samples made of carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic were fabricated. Each sample was subjected to a series of three impacts at the same location on each specimen. The energies of these impacts were 5, 10, and 20 J, applied in that or reverse order. Composite thermal properties were determined in a semi-automatic way with a small participation of the thermographer. This provided data spread from 0.6% to 2.4% for all evaluated parameters. The damage after each impact was evaluated by both one- and two-sided thermal nondestructive testing procedures on each impact site and on the surface opposite each impact site. The test results were statistically evaluated and revealed increasing values of effusivity/diffusivity as the impact energy increased and as second and third impacts were applied. However, if the order of impact energies was reversed, and changed to 20, 10, and 5 J, much smaller changes in damage were observed after each sequential impact. It appears that the most severe defect occurs after the first impact of 20 J, and further impacts of lower energies do not create much additional damage. Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса |
| Lingua: | inglese |
| Pubblicazione: |
2019
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ab018e |
| Natura: | Elettronico Capitolo di libro |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=660070 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa0a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 660070 | ||
| 005 | 20250328160223.0 | ||
| 035 | |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\28992 | ||
| 035 | |a RU\TPU\network\24216 | ||
| 090 | |a 660070 | ||
| 100 | |a 20190422d2019 k||y0rusy50 ba | ||
| 101 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 102 | |a GB | ||
| 135 | |a drcn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | |a i | |
| 182 | 0 | |a b | |
| 200 | 1 | |a Characterizing impact damage in GFRP/CFRP composites by determining thermal effusivity/diffusivity |f V. P. Vavilov [et al.] | |
| 203 | |a Text |c electronic | ||
| 300 | |a Title screen | ||
| 330 | |a Local variations of thermal effusivity and diffusivity are suggested as indicators of severity of impact damage in composites. A relative variation of diffusivity is a unique parameter of composite quality, while relative variations of apparent effusivity are time-dependent in non-adiabatic samples heated with a square pulse thus requiring a proper choice of optimum observation time. In this study, 36 samples made of glass-fiber-reinforced plastic and 54 samples made of carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic were fabricated. Each sample was subjected to a series of three impacts at the same location on each specimen. The energies of these impacts were 5, 10, and 20 J, applied in that or reverse order. Composite thermal properties were determined in a semi-automatic way with a small participation of the thermographer. This provided data spread from 0.6% to 2.4% for all evaluated parameters. The damage after each impact was evaluated by both one- and two-sided thermal nondestructive testing procedures on each impact site and on the surface opposite each impact site. The test results were statistically evaluated and revealed increasing values of effusivity/diffusivity as the impact energy increased and as second and third impacts were applied. However, if the order of impact energies was reversed, and changed to 20, 10, and 5 J, much smaller changes in damage were observed after each sequential impact. It appears that the most severe defect occurs after the first impact of 20 J, and further impacts of lower energies do not create much additional damage. | ||
| 333 | |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса | ||
| 461 | |t Measurement Science and Technology | ||
| 463 | |t Vol. 28, iss 3 : Special Feature on Nondestructive Evaluation of Materials |v [034003, 11 p.] |d 2019 | ||
| 610 | 1 | |a электронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a труды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | |a ударные повреждения | |
| 610 | 1 | |a композиты | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Vavilov |b V. P. |c Specialist in the field of dosimetry and methodology of nondestructive testing (NDT) |c Doctor of technical sciences (DSc), Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU) |f 1949- |g Vladimir Platonovich |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\32161 |9 16163 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Chulkov |b A. O. |c specialist in the field of non-destructive testing |c Deputy Director for Scientific and Educational Activities; acting manager; Senior Researcher, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Technical Sciences |f 1989- |g Arseniy Olegovich |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\32220 |9 16220 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Smotrov |b A. V. |g Andrey Vladimirovich | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Smotrova |b S. A. |g Svetlana | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Moskovchenko |b A. I. |g Aleksey Igorevich | |
| 712 | 0 | 2 | |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет |b Инженерная школа неразрушающего контроля и безопасности |b Отделение электронной инженерии |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23507 |
| 712 | 0 | 2 | |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет |b Инженерная школа информационных технологий и робототехники |b Отделение автоматизации и робототехники (ОАР) |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23553 |
| 801 | 2 | |a RU |b 63413507 |c 20190422 |g RCR | |
| 856 | 4 | |u https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ab018e | |
| 942 | |c CF | ||