Analysis of Plane-Parallel Electron Beam Propagation in Different Media by Numerical Simulation Methods; Russian Physics Journal; Vol. 60, iss. 12
| Parent link: | Russian Physics Journal Vol. 60, iss. 12.— 2018.— P. 2115–2122 |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
| Resumo: | Title screen Simulation by the Monte Carlo method is widely used to calculate the character of ionizing radiation interaction with substance. A wide variety of programs based on the given method allows users to choose the most suitable package for solving computational problems. In turn, it is important to know exactly restrictions of numerical systems to avoid gross errors. Results of estimation of the feasibility of application of the program PCLab (Computer Laboratory, version 9.9) for numerical simulation of the electron energy distribution absorbed in beryllium, aluminum, gold, and water for industrial, research, and clinical beams are presented. The data obtained using programs ITS and Geant4 being the most popular software packages for solving the given problems and the program PCLab are presented in the graphic form. A comparison and an analysis of the results obtained demonstrate the feasibility of application of the program PCLab for simulation of the absorbed energy distribution and dose of electrons in various materials for energies in the range 1–20 MeV. |
| Idioma: | inglês |
| Publicado em: |
2018
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Acesso em linha: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11182-018-1334-5 |
| Formato: | Recurso Electrónico Capítulo de Livro |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=658206 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa0a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 658206 | ||
| 005 | 20251024151521.0 | ||
| 035 | |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\25474 | ||
| 090 | |a 658206 | ||
| 100 | |a 20180626d2018 k||y0engy50 ba | ||
| 101 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 135 | |a drcn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | |a i | |
| 182 | 0 | |a b | |
| 200 | 1 | |a Analysis of Plane-Parallel Electron Beam Propagation in Different Media by Numerical Simulation Methods |f I. A. Miloichikova [et al.] | |
| 203 | |a Текст |c электронный |b визуальный | ||
| 300 | |a Title screen | ||
| 320 | |a References: 15 tit | ||
| 330 | |a Simulation by the Monte Carlo method is widely used to calculate the character of ionizing radiation interaction with substance. A wide variety of programs based on the given method allows users to choose the most suitable package for solving computational problems. In turn, it is important to know exactly restrictions of numerical systems to avoid gross errors. Results of estimation of the feasibility of application of the program PCLab (Computer Laboratory, version 9.9) for numerical simulation of the electron energy distribution absorbed in beryllium, aluminum, gold, and water for industrial, research, and clinical beams are presented. The data obtained using programs ITS and Geant4 being the most popular software packages for solving the given problems and the program PCLab are presented in the graphic form. A comparison and an analysis of the results obtained demonstrate the feasibility of application of the program PCLab for simulation of the absorbed energy distribution and dose of electrons in various materials for energies in the range 1–20 MeV. | ||
| 461 | 1 | |t Russian Physics Journal | |
| 463 | 1 | |t Vol. 60, iss. 12 |v P. 2115–2122 |d 2018 | |
| 610 | 1 | |a электронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a труды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | |a электронные лучи | |
| 610 | 1 | |a численное моделирование | |
| 610 | 1 | |a метод Монте-Карло | |
| 610 | 1 | |a распределение | |
| 610 | 1 | |a энергия | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Miloichikova |b I. A. |c physicist |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences |f 1988- |g Irina Alekseevna |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\35525 |9 18707 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Bespalov |b V. I. |c physicist |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, candidate of physical and mathematical sciences |f 1946- |g Valery Ivanovich |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\34855 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Krasnykh |b A. A. |c physicist |c engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University |f 1993- |g Angelina Aleksandrovna |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\42218 |9 21498 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Stuchebrov |b S. G. |c physicist |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences |f 1981- |g Sergey Gennadevich |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31559 |9 15719 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Cherepennikov |b Yu. M. |c physicist |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Sciences |f 1989- |g Yuriy Mihaylovich |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31561 |9 15721 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Dusaev |b R. R. |c specialist in the field of nuclear physics |c Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University |f 1988- |g Renat Ramilyevich |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\30972 |9 15210 | |
| 801 | 2 | |a RU |b 63413507 |c 20181116 |g RCR | |
| 850 | |a 63413507 | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11182-018-1334-5 |z https://doi.org/10.1007/s11182-018-1334-5 |
| 942 | |c CF | ||