|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000naa0a2200000 4500 |
| 001 |
657594 |
| 005 |
20250623164945.0 |
| 035 |
|
|
|a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\24137
|
| 090 |
|
|
|a 657594
|
| 100 |
|
|
|a 20180219d2017 k y0engy50 ca
|
| 101 |
0 |
|
|a eng
|
| 102 |
|
|
|a HU
|
| 135 |
|
|
|a drcn ---uucaa
|
| 181 |
|
0 |
|a i
|
| 182 |
|
0 |
|a b
|
| 200 |
1 |
|
|a Integration versus Inclusion in Russian Vocational Education
|f E. N. Rogotneva, N. N. Meshcheryakova
|
| 203 |
|
|
|a Text
|c electronic
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a Title screen
|
| 320 |
|
|
|a [References: p. 112-113 (13 tit.)]
|
| 330 |
|
|
|a This paper represents the comparative analysis of three forms of vocational education for students withdisabilities in Russia. Findings pertain to a broader research project employing a usual research methodologyin higher education research and students with disabilities: the expert survey. The general purpose is toanalyse barriers and support identified as affecting access, academic performance and overall perception ofthe vocational education experience. This paper focuses only on the pros and cons of segregated special needsschools, mainstream schools and inclusive schools. Some experts argue that special needs schools are betterplaces for students with disabilities as they are better equipped to deal with each person’s specific impairment.Others argue that disabled students should be aligned with the necessary level before they are integrated.Most experts believe that only inclusive education enables disabled people to participate effectively in a freesociety.
|
| 463 |
|
|
|t International Congresses on Education (ERPA 2017)
|o book of proceedings, Budapest, Hungary, 18-21 May 2017
|v [P. 107-113]
|d 2017
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a электронный ресурс
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a труды учёных ТПУ
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a forms of education
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a inclusion
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a students with disabilities
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a mainstream education
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a social integration
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a инклюзивное образование
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a ограниченные возможности
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a социальная интеграция
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a профессиональное образование
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a студенты-инвалиды
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a Россия
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a высшие учебные заведения
|
| 700 |
|
1 |
|a Rogotneva
|b E. N.
|c Sociologist
|c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of philosophical sciences
|f 1976-
|g Elena Nikolaevna
|3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33824
|9 17418
|
| 701 |
|
1 |
|a Meshcheryakova
|b N. N.
|c historian
|c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, candidate of historical sciences
|f 1972-
|g Nataliya Nikolaevna
|3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\37058
|
| 712 |
0 |
2 |
|a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)
|b Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ)
|b Кафедра социальных коммуникаций (СК)
|3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\21254
|
| 712 |
0 |
2 |
|a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет
|b Школа базовой инженерной подготовки
|b Отделение социально-гуманитарных наук
|3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23512
|
| 801 |
|
0 |
|a RU
|b 63413507
|c 20201105
|g RCR
|
| 850 |
|
|
|a 63413507
|
| 856 |
4 |
|
|u https://www.erpacongress.com/upload/dosya/e-book-of-proceedings_withISBN.pdf#page=108
|
| 942 |
|
|
|c CF
|
