Ecological imperative in social responsibility structure of engineers; The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS); Vol. 26 : Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI 2016)

Podrobná bibliografie
Parent link:The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS)
Vol. 26 : Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI 2016).— 2017.— [P. 838-843]
Korporativní autor: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Школа базовой инженерной подготовки (ШБИП) Отделение иностранных языков (ОИЯ)
Další autoři: Rubanova E. V. Elena Vitalievna, Rubanov V. G. Vitaliy Georgievich, Zeremskaya Yu. A. Yuliya Aleksandrovna, Cheng Xinhan, Shcherbinin A. Aleksey
Shrnutí:Title screen
Changes in the world social and political situation, functional changes in an engineering activity and its globalization lead to the rise of new questions. There is a necessity to form new approaches and mechanisms for the formation of engineers’ responsibilities. Common sense and social responsibility should be the basis for engineering. The solution of moral problems associated with technology and technological solutions on Nature transformation leads to the formulating “Code of Ethics for engineers”. Professional responsibilities and obligations of future engineers should be given in the system of higher professional education. Various approaches to this issue show that this challenge is complex and unsolved. Social responsibility of engineers should be a continuous learning based on the accumulated experience of previous generations. Actuality of this issue can be explained by the solutions made by technocratic approaches. Thus, the problem of humanization and humanization of engineering is very important. The aim of the study is to determine the importance of ecological imperative in the formation of social responsibility of an engineer. We define the essence of the social responsibility of engineers, to analyze the quality of humanitarian training engineers, to present the dynamics of an ecological component in engineering worldview. Moreover, the results of engineers’ activity should be aimed at the interest of humanity and environment preservation. Ecological knowledge is interpreted as the highest achievements of human culture, a desire to create conditions for co-evolution and harmonization of relation of the “Nature-Society” system and to form an engineer with new ecological thinking.
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: 2017
Témata:
On-line přístup:http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.07.02.108
http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/46319
Médium: Elektronický zdroj Kapitola
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=657432

MARC

LEADER 00000nla2a2200000 4500
001 657432
005 20231225101912.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\23952 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\23950 
090 |a 657432 
100 |a 20180205a2017 k y0engy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
105 |a y z 100zy 
135 |a drgn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Ecological imperative in social responsibility structure of engineers  |f E. V. Rubanova [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: p. 843 (10 tit.)] 
330 |a Changes in the world social and political situation, functional changes in an engineering activity and its globalization lead to the rise of new questions. There is a necessity to form new approaches and mechanisms for the formation of engineers’ responsibilities. Common sense and social responsibility should be the basis for engineering. The solution of moral problems associated with technology and technological solutions on Nature transformation leads to the formulating “Code of Ethics for engineers”. Professional responsibilities and obligations of future engineers should be given in the system of higher professional education. Various approaches to this issue show that this challenge is complex and unsolved. Social responsibility of engineers should be a continuous learning based on the accumulated experience of previous generations. Actuality of this issue can be explained by the solutions made by technocratic approaches. Thus, the problem of humanization and humanization of engineering is very important. The aim of the study is to determine the importance of ecological imperative in the formation of social responsibility of an engineer. We define the essence of the social responsibility of engineers, to analyze the quality of humanitarian training engineers, to present the dynamics of an ecological component in engineering worldview. Moreover, the results of engineers’ activity should be aimed at the interest of humanity and environment preservation. Ecological knowledge is interpreted as the highest achievements of human culture, a desire to create conditions for co-evolution and harmonization of relation of the “Nature-Society” system and to form an engineer with new ecological thinking. 
461 0 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\11959  |t The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS) 
463 0 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\23894  |t Vol. 26 : Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI 2016)  |o International Conference, 07-10 November 2016, Tomsk, Russian Federation  |o [proceedings]  |f National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU) ; eds. A. Yu. Karpova [et al.]  |v [P. 838-843]  |d 2017 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a engineer 
610 1 |a ethic 
610 1 |a social responsibility 
610 1 |a environmental literacy 
610 1 |a environmental demand 
610 1 |a обязанности 
610 1 |a социальная ответственность 
610 1 |a инженерная деятельность 
610 1 |a этика 
610 1 |a экологический императив 
610 1 |a экологические знания 
701 1 |a Rubanova  |b E. V.  |c philosopher  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences  |f 1971-  |g Elena Vitalievna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33589 
701 1 |a Rubanov  |b V. G.  |c Philosopher  |c Doctor of Philosophy (D.Phil), Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1940-  |g Vitaliy Georgievich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\29603 
701 1 |a Zeremskaya  |b Yu. A.  |c linguist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of philological sciences  |f 1980-  |g Yuliya Aleksandrovna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31966  |9 16026 
701 0 |a Cheng Xinhan 
701 1 |a Shcherbinin  |b A.  |g Aleksey 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Школа базовой инженерной подготовки (ШБИП)  |b Отделение иностранных языков (ОИЯ)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23510 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20180208  |g RCR 
856 4 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.07.02.108 
856 4 |u http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/46319 
942 |c CF