Paradigm of Technoscience and Responsible Research and Innovation Approach
| Parent link: | The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS) Vol. 26 : Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI 2016).— 2017.— [P. 144-150] |
|---|---|
| Hovedforfatter: | |
| Institution som forfatter: | |
| Summary: | Title screen The paper gives comparative analysis of the three priority phenomena of the contemporary science, namely the programme of the research marked by the term “Responsible Research and Innovation” (hereafter RRI), transdisciplinary research marked as Technology Assessment (hereafter TA) and the phenomenon of Technoscience (Science Technology and Society Studies). Philosophic analysis of the contemporary science trends of development allows showing that science is no longer a matter of the armchair scientists, but an action included to social practice. Fundamental research, technoscience and technology assessment convergently interact. As a result, the new is not revealed, but is constructed in the space of interaction between science and society. Since the subject of the technoscience is represented by complex self-developing systems including a human being, scientific activity begins to be regulated by additional compared to traditional science ethical norms. There is a need to carry out additional reflection on scientific knowledge in the form of socio-ethical expertise of models and projects, for example, in order to identify social risks. The paper shows that in technoscience knowledge is produced not only in the context of revelation and fundamental grounding, but in the context of the assessed aftereffect as well(social assessment of technology). |
| Sprog: | engelsk |
| Udgivet: |
2017
|
| Fag: | |
| Online adgang: | http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.07.02.19 http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/46288 |
| Format: | Electronisk Book Chapter |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=657393 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nla2a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 657393 | ||
| 005 | 20231101134953.0 | ||
| 035 | |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\23901 | ||
| 035 | |a RU\TPU\network\23895 | ||
| 090 | |a 657393 | ||
| 100 | |a 20180202a2017 k y0engy50 ba | ||
| 101 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 105 | |a y z 100zy | ||
| 135 | |a drgn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | |a i | |
| 182 | 0 | |a b | |
| 200 | 1 | |a Paradigm of Technoscience and Responsible Research and Innovation Approach |f I. V. Chernikova | |
| 203 | |a Text |c electronic | ||
| 300 | |a Title screen | ||
| 320 | |a [References: p. 149-150 (10 tit.)] | ||
| 330 | |a The paper gives comparative analysis of the three priority phenomena of the contemporary science, namely the programme of the research marked by the term “Responsible Research and Innovation” (hereafter RRI), transdisciplinary research marked as Technology Assessment (hereafter TA) and the phenomenon of Technoscience (Science Technology and Society Studies). Philosophic analysis of the contemporary science trends of development allows showing that science is no longer a matter of the armchair scientists, but an action included to social practice. Fundamental research, technoscience and technology assessment convergently interact. As a result, the new is not revealed, but is constructed in the space of interaction between science and society. Since the subject of the technoscience is represented by complex self-developing systems including a human being, scientific activity begins to be regulated by additional compared to traditional science ethical norms. There is a need to carry out additional reflection on scientific knowledge in the form of socio-ethical expertise of models and projects, for example, in order to identify social risks. The paper shows that in technoscience knowledge is produced not only in the context of revelation and fundamental grounding, but in the context of the assessed aftereffect as well(social assessment of technology). | ||
| 461 | 0 | |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\11959 |t The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS) | |
| 463 | 0 | |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\23894 |t Vol. 26 : Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI 2016) |o International Conference, 07-10 November 2016, Tomsk, Russian Federation |o [proceedings] |f National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU) ; eds. A. Yu. Karpova [et al.] |v [P. 144-150] |d 2017 | |
| 610 | 1 | |a электронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a труды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | |a technoscience | |
| 610 | 1 | |a technology assessment | |
| 610 | 1 | |a responsible research and innovation | |
| 610 | 1 | |a knowledge | |
| 610 | 1 | |a технологии | |
| 610 | 1 | |a знания | |
| 610 | 1 | |a инновации | |
| 610 | 1 | |a парадигмы | |
| 610 | 1 | |a инновационный подход | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chernikova |b I. V. |c specialist in the field of psychology and law |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of Philosophical Sciences |f 1953- |g Irina Vasilievna |2 stltpush |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33617 | |
| 712 | 0 | 2 | |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) |b Школа базовой инженерной подготовки (ШБИП) |b Отделение социально-гуманитарных наук (ОСГН) |h 8033 |2 stltpush |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23512 |
| 801 | 2 | |a RU |b 63413507 |c 20180208 |g RCR | |
| 856 | 4 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.07.02.19 | |
| 856 | 4 | |u http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/46288 | |
| 942 | |c CF | ||