Targeting group I p21-activated kinases to control malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor growth and metastasis; Oncogene; Vol. 36, iss. 38

Bibliografiske detaljer
Parent link:Oncogene.— , 1987-
Vol. 36, iss. 38.— 2017.— [P. 5421–5431]
Institution som forfatter: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Физико-технический институт (ФТИ) Лаборатория радиационного контроля № 31 (Лаборатория РК № 31)
Andre forfattere: Semenova G. V. Galina Vasiljevna, Stepanova D. S. Dina Sergeevna, Dubyk Cara C. W., Handorf E., Deev S. M. Sergey Mikhaylovich, Lazar A. J., Chernoff J. Jonathan
Summary:Title screen
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are devastating sarcomas for which no effective medical therapies are available. Over 50% of MPSNTs are associated with mutations in NF1 tumor suppressor gene, resulting in activation of Ras and its effectors, including the Raf/Mek/Erk and PI3K/Akt/mTORC1 signaling cascades, and also the WNT/β-catenin pathway. As Group I p21-activated kinases (Group I Paks, PAK1/2/3) have been shown to modulate Ras-driven oncogenesis, we asked if these enzymes might regulate signaling in MPNSTs. In this study we found a strong positive correlation between the activity of PAK1/2/3 and the stage of human MPNSTs. We determined that reducing Group I Pak activity diminished MPNST cell proliferation and motility, and that these effects were not accompanied by significant blockade of the Raf/Mek/Erk pathway, but rather by reductions in Akt and β- catenin activity. Using the small molecule PAK1/2/3 inhibitor Frax1036 and the MEK1/2 inhibitor PD0325901, we showed that the combination of these two agents synergistically inhibited MPNST cell growth in vitro and dramatically decreased local and metastatic MPNST growth in animal models. Taken together, these data provide new insights into MPNST signaling deregulation and suggest that co-targeting of PAK1/2/3 and MEK1/2 may be effective in the treatment of patients with MPNSTs.
Sprog:engelsk
Udgivet: 2017
Fag:
Online adgang:https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2017.143
Format: Electronisk Book Chapter
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=657244

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 657244
005 20250121092357.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\23746 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\23367 
090 |a 657244 
100 |a 20180122d2017 k||y0engy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a GB 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Targeting group I p21-activated kinases to control malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor growth and metastasis  |f G. V. Semenova [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: p. 54-30 (45 tit.)] 
330 |a Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are devastating sarcomas for which no effective medical therapies are available. Over 50% of MPSNTs are associated with mutations in NF1 tumor suppressor gene, resulting in activation of Ras and its effectors, including the Raf/Mek/Erk and PI3K/Akt/mTORC1 signaling cascades, and also the WNT/β-catenin pathway. As Group I p21-activated kinases (Group I Paks, PAK1/2/3) have been shown to modulate Ras-driven oncogenesis, we asked if these enzymes might regulate signaling in MPNSTs. In this study we found a strong positive correlation between the activity of PAK1/2/3 and the stage of human MPNSTs. We determined that reducing Group I Pak activity diminished MPNST cell proliferation and motility, and that these effects were not accompanied by significant blockade of the Raf/Mek/Erk pathway, but rather by reductions in Akt and β- catenin activity. Using the small molecule PAK1/2/3 inhibitor Frax1036 and the MEK1/2 inhibitor PD0325901, we showed that the combination of these two agents synergistically inhibited MPNST cell growth in vitro and dramatically decreased local and metastatic MPNST growth in animal models. Taken together, these data provide new insights into MPNST signaling deregulation and suggest that co-targeting of PAK1/2/3 and MEK1/2 may be effective in the treatment of patients with MPNSTs. 
461 |t Oncogene  |d 1987- 
463 |t Vol. 36, iss. 38  |v [P. 5421–5431]  |d 2017 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a новообразования 
610 1 |a опухоли 
610 1 |a корреляции 
610 1 |a лечение 
610 1 |a нервные сети 
701 1 |a Semenova  |b G. V.  |g Galina Vasiljevna 
701 1 |a Stepanova  |b D. S.  |g Dina Sergeevna 
701 1 |a Dubyk  |b Cara  |g C. W. 
701 1 |a Handorf  |g E. 
701 1 |a Deev  |b S. M.  |c biologist  |c the expert of Tomsk Polytechnic University, doctor of biological Sciences  |g Sergey Mikhaylovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\39299 
701 1 |a Lazar  |b A. J. 
701 1 |a Chernoff  |b J.  |g Jonathan 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Физико-технический институт (ФТИ)  |b Лаборатория радиационного контроля № 31 (Лаборатория РК № 31)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\19161 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20180122  |g RCR 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2017.143 
942 |c CF