4-Aroyl-3-hydroxy-5-phenyl-1H-pyrrol-2(5H)-ones as N-formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) antagonists; Biochemical Pharmacology; Vol. 142

Библиографические подробности
Источник:Biochemical Pharmacology
Vol. 142.— 2017.— [P. 120-132]
Корпоративные авторы: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Управление проректора по научной работе и инновациям (НРиИ) Центр RASA в Томске Лаборатория изучения механизмов нейропротекции (Лаб. ИМН), Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт физики высоких технологий (ИФВТ) Кафедра биотехнологии и органической химии (БИОХ)
Другие авторы: Kirpotina L. N. Liliya Nikolaevna, Shchepyotkin I. A. Igor Aleksandrovich, Khlebnikov A. I. Andrey Ivanovich, Ruban O. I. Olga Ivanovna, Ge Yunjun, Ye R. D. Richard, Kominsky D. J. Douglas, Quinn M. T. Mark
Примечания:Title screen
Formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) are expressed on a variety of leukocytes and play important roles in inflammation. Thus, FPR antagonists may represent novel therapeutics for modulating innate immunity and treating inflammatory diseases. Previously, 1H-pyrrol-2(5H)-ones were reported to be potent and competitive FPR1 antagonists. In the present studies, 42 additional 1H-pyrrol-2(5H)-one analogs were evaluated for FPR1 antagonist activity. We identified a number of novel competitive FPR1 antagonists that inhibited N-formylmethionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLF)-induced intracellular Ca2+ mobilization in FPR1-transfected HL60 cells and effectively competed with WKYMVm-FITC for binding to FPR1 in FPR1-transfected RBL cells. The most active pyrroles inhibited human neutrophil Ca2+ flux, chemotaxis, and adhesion to human epithelial cells, with the most potent being compounds 14 (4-benzoyl-1-hexyl-3-hydroxy-5-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrol-2-one) and 17 (4-benzoyl-5-(2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-3-hydroxy-1-(2-methoxyethyl)-2,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrol-2-one). In addition, these FPR1 antagonists inhibited fMLF-induced phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK1/2) in FPR1-RBL cells, differentiated HL-60 cells, and human neutrophils. Most of the antagonists were specific for FPR1 and did not inhibit WKYMVM/WKYMVm-induced intracellular Ca2+ mobilization in FPR2-HL60 cells, FPR3-HL60 cells, or interleukin 8-induced Ca2+ flux in human neutrophils. Moreover, molecular modeling showed that the active pyrroles had a significantly higher degree of similarity with the FPR1 antagonist pharmacophore template as compared to inactive analogs. Thus, the 4-aroyl-3-hydroxy-5-phenyl-1H-pyrrol-2(5H)-one scaffold represents an important backbone for the development of novel FPR1 antagonists and could provide important clues for understanding the molecular structural requirements of FPR1 antagonists.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
Язык:английский
Опубликовано: 2017
Предметы:
Online-ссылка:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2017.07.004
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Запись в KOHA:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=656904

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 656904
005 20250407115246.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\23384 
090 |a 656904 
100 |a 20171220d2017 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a NL 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a 4-Aroyl-3-hydroxy-5-phenyl-1H-pyrrol-2(5H)-ones as N-formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) antagonists  |f L. N. Kirpotina, I. A. Shchepyotkin, A. I. Khlebnikov [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: p. 131-132 (55 tit.)] 
330 |a Formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) are expressed on a variety of leukocytes and play important roles in inflammation. Thus, FPR antagonists may represent novel therapeutics for modulating innate immunity and treating inflammatory diseases. Previously, 1H-pyrrol-2(5H)-ones were reported to be potent and competitive FPR1 antagonists. In the present studies, 42 additional 1H-pyrrol-2(5H)-one analogs were evaluated for FPR1 antagonist activity. We identified a number of novel competitive FPR1 antagonists that inhibited N-formylmethionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLF)-induced intracellular Ca2+ mobilization in FPR1-transfected HL60 cells and effectively competed with WKYMVm-FITC for binding to FPR1 in FPR1-transfected RBL cells. The most active pyrroles inhibited human neutrophil Ca2+ flux, chemotaxis, and adhesion to human epithelial cells, with the most potent being compounds 14 (4-benzoyl-1-hexyl-3-hydroxy-5-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrol-2-one) and 17 (4-benzoyl-5-(2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-3-hydroxy-1-(2-methoxyethyl)-2,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrol-2-one). In addition, these FPR1 antagonists inhibited fMLF-induced phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK1/2) in FPR1-RBL cells, differentiated HL-60 cells, and human neutrophils. Most of the antagonists were specific for FPR1 and did not inhibit WKYMVM/WKYMVm-induced intracellular Ca2+ mobilization in FPR2-HL60 cells, FPR3-HL60 cells, or interleukin 8-induced Ca2+ flux in human neutrophils. Moreover, molecular modeling showed that the active pyrroles had a significantly higher degree of similarity with the FPR1 antagonist pharmacophore template as compared to inactive analogs. Thus, the 4-aroyl-3-hydroxy-5-phenyl-1H-pyrrol-2(5H)-one scaffold represents an important backbone for the development of novel FPR1 antagonists and could provide important clues for understanding the molecular structural requirements of FPR1 antagonists. 
333 |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса 
461 |t Biochemical Pharmacology 
463 |t Vol. 142  |v [P. 120-132]  |d 2017 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a antagonist 
610 1 |a formyl peptide receptor 
610 1 |a neutrophil 
610 1 |a molecular modeling 
610 1 |a антагонист 
610 1 |a формил-пептиды 
610 1 |a пирролы 
610 1 |a нейтрофилы 
610 1 |a молекулярное моделирование 
701 1 |a Kirpotina  |b L. N.  |g Liliya Nikolaevna 
701 1 |a Shchepyotkin  |b I. A.  |c doctor-biophysicist  |c leading researcher of Tomsk Polytechnic University, candidate of medical science  |f 1962-  |g Igor Aleksandrovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\37358 
701 1 |a Khlebnikov  |b A. I.  |c Chemist  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1963-  |g Andrey Ivanovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33927  |9 17500 
701 1 |a Ruban  |b O. I.  |g Olga Ivanovna 
701 0 |a Ge Yunjun 
701 1 |a Ye  |b R. D.  |g Richard 
701 1 |a Kominsky  |b D. J.  |g Douglas 
701 1 |a Quinn  |b M. T.  |g Mark 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Управление проректора по научной работе и инновациям (НРиИ)  |b Центр RASA в Томске  |b Лаборатория изучения механизмов нейропротекции (Лаб. ИМН)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\21815 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Институт физики высоких технологий (ИФВТ)  |b Кафедра биотехнологии и органической химии (БИОХ)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18693 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20201103  |g RCR 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2017.07.004 
942 |c CF