Common trends of global education: educational methods in USA and Russia; The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS); Vol. 26 : Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI 2016)

Podrobná bibliografie
Parent link:The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS)
Vol. 26 : Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI 2016).— 2017.— [P. 99-105]
Korporace: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ) Кафедра истории и философии науки и техники (ИФНТ), Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт кибернетики (ИК) Кафедра автоматики и компьютерных систем (АИКС), Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт природных ресурсов (ИПР) Кафедра бурения скважин (БС)
Další autoři: Brylina I. V. Irina Vladimirovna, Khakimova F. S. Farida Sabitovna, Brylin V. I. Vladimir Ivanovich, Kuznetsov P. V. Pavel Viktorovich
Shrnutí:Title screen
This article touches upon the issues of changes in the educational system in the knowledge society. The main purpose of this research is the study of new teaching methods, with due regard to the needs of society and human potential. For this purpose, educational methods of the US and Russia were analyzed and compared, their advantages and disadvantages were estimated, and common trends in the development of education were identified. It is stated that during the formation of innovative methods of education for future generations, it is necessary to take into account ethical standards of each ethnic group, culture and traditions of specific country, as well as psycho-physical standards of students. It is justified that the idea of the creation of unified teaching methods for the entire planet population is impossible due to geographic, ethnic, political, and economic differences of every country. However, according to research results of popular techniques, it is possible to develop a model of the most appropriate educational method for the vast majority of countries with due consideration of constant development of science as the main influence factor on methods of education. It is concluded that the general trends of global education are individualization and humanization. They lead to the formation of flexible, critical, creative and effective thinking of students in terms of variability and uncertainty of social reality.
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: 2017
Témata:
On-line přístup:http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.07.02.13
http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/46276
Médium: Elektronický zdroj Kapitola
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=656545

MARC

LEADER 00000nla2a2200000 4500
001 656545
005 20240125120250.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\22986 
090 |a 656545 
100 |a 20171117a2017 k y0engy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
105 |a y z 100zy 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Common trends of global education: educational methods in USA and Russia  |f I. V. Brylina [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: p. 104-105 (18 tit.)] 
330 |a This article touches upon the issues of changes in the educational system in the knowledge society. The main purpose of this research is the study of new teaching methods, with due regard to the needs of society and human potential. For this purpose, educational methods of the US and Russia were analyzed and compared, their advantages and disadvantages were estimated, and common trends in the development of education were identified. It is stated that during the formation of innovative methods of education for future generations, it is necessary to take into account ethical standards of each ethnic group, culture and traditions of specific country, as well as psycho-physical standards of students. It is justified that the idea of the creation of unified teaching methods for the entire planet population is impossible due to geographic, ethnic, political, and economic differences of every country. However, according to research results of popular techniques, it is possible to develop a model of the most appropriate educational method for the vast majority of countries with due consideration of constant development of science as the main influence factor on methods of education. It is concluded that the general trends of global education are individualization and humanization. They lead to the formation of flexible, critical, creative and effective thinking of students in terms of variability and uncertainty of social reality. 
461 0 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\11959  |t The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS) 
463 0 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\23894  |t Vol. 26 : Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI 2016)  |o International Conference, 07-10 November 2016, Tomsk, Russian Federation  |o [proceedings]  |f National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU) ; eds. A. Yu. Karpova [et al.]  |v [P. 99-105]  |d 2017 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a Global education 
610 1 |a educational methods 
610 1 |a educational models 
610 1 |a individualization and humanization of education 
610 1 |a criticalthinking 
610 1 |a глобальное образование 
610 1 |a образовательные модели 
610 1 |a гуманизация 
610 1 |a образование 
610 1 |a персонализация 
610 1 |a критическое мышление 
701 1 |a Brylina  |b I. V.  |c philosopher  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of Philosophy  |f 1967-  |g Irina Vladimirovna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33600  |9 17258 
701 1 |a Khakimova  |b F. S.  |g Farida Sabitovna 
701 1 |a Brylin  |b V. I.  |c mining engineer  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of technical sciences  |f 1940-  |g Vladimir Ivanovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\32822 
701 1 |a Kuznetsov  |b P. V.  |c physicist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of physical and mathematical sciences  |f 1952-  |g Pavel Viktorovich  |9 17882 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ)  |b Кафедра истории и философии науки и техники (ИФНТ)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\21252 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Институт кибернетики (ИК)  |b Кафедра автоматики и компьютерных систем (АИКС)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18698 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Институт природных ресурсов (ИПР)  |b Кафедра бурения скважин (БС)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18666 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20180208  |g RCR 
856 4 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.07.02.13 
856 4 |u http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/46276 
942 |c CF