“There is nothing more permanent than something temporary”: The problem of endless transition periods in historiography of Russian economic wellbeing; SGEM. 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts; Bk. 3, vol. 2

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
Parent link:SGEM. 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts: conference proceedings, Albena, Bulgariaм, Aug. 24-31, 2016.— , 2016
Bk. 3, vol. 2.— 2016.— [P. 605-612]
مؤلفون مشاركون: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ) Кафедра истории и философии науки и техники (ИФНТ), Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ) Кафедра инженерного предпринимательства (ИП)
مؤلفون آخرون: Ageeva V. V. Vera Valentinovna, Selevich T. S. Tatiana Semenovna, Levashkina Z. N. Zoya Nikolaevna, Galkina P. V. Polina Vadimovna
الملخص:Title screen
The problem of transition periods in Russian economy is one of the key points among the Russian Studies’ discussions in our country as well as abroad. The concept of “transitional period of Russian economy” is often associated with radical economic reforms of the 1990s, however, the use of the term “transition period” has a long historical tradition in Russian and Soviet economical mind. The objective of this article is to define the main trends of modern historiography in studies of long and numerous economic transitions in Russian history of the 19th and 20th centuries as factors of economic wellbeing. The authors discuss one of the sustainable practices of Russian economic transitions - the inevitable and long-term preservation of socio-economic and political anachronisms that occurs every time when the government tried to overcome the gap between Russia and advanced countries, the economic leaders. Research results show historiographical interest in the development of unique Russian combinations of economic phenomena such as “state capitalism”, “conservative reformism”, “socialistic monopolism”, “radical liberal reforms” which accompanied the five stages of system Russian modernization.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
اللغة:الإنجليزية
منشور في: 2016
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://www.sgemsocial.org/ssgemlib/spip.php?article3110
التنسيق: الكتروني فصل الكتاب
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=656404

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 656404
005 20250620133137.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\22845 
090 |a 656404 
100 |a 20171110d2016 k y0engy50 ca 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a BG 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a “There is nothing more permanent than something temporary”: The problem of endless transition periods in historiography of Russian economic wellbeing  |f V. V. Ageeva [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
330 |a The problem of transition periods in Russian economy is one of the key points among the Russian Studies’ discussions in our country as well as abroad. The concept of “transitional period of Russian economy” is often associated with radical economic reforms of the 1990s, however, the use of the term “transition period” has a long historical tradition in Russian and Soviet economical mind. The objective of this article is to define the main trends of modern historiography in studies of long and numerous economic transitions in Russian history of the 19th and 20th centuries as factors of economic wellbeing. The authors discuss one of the sustainable practices of Russian economic transitions - the inevitable and long-term preservation of socio-economic and political anachronisms that occurs every time when the government tried to overcome the gap between Russia and advanced countries, the economic leaders. Research results show historiographical interest in the development of unique Russian combinations of economic phenomena such as “state capitalism”, “conservative reformism”, “socialistic monopolism”, “radical liberal reforms” which accompanied the five stages of system Russian modernization. 
333 |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса 
461 |t SGEM. 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts  |o conference proceedings, Albena, Bulgariaм, Aug. 24-31, 2016  |d 2016 
463 |t Bk. 3, vol. 2  |v [P. 605-612]  |d 2016 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a экономическое благополучие 
610 1 |a переходный период 
610 1 |a российская история 
610 1 |a экономическая модернизация 
610 1 |a государственный капитализм 
701 1 |a Ageeva  |b V. V.  |c historian  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of historical sciences  |f 1986-  |g Vera Valentinovna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33517  |9 17185 
701 1 |a Selevich  |b T. S.  |c economist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of economic sciences  |f 1980-  |g Tatiana Semenovna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\30990  |9 15227 
701 1 |a Levashkina  |b Z. N.  |g Zoya Nikolaevna 
701 1 |a Galkina  |b P. V.  |g Polina Vadimovna 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ)  |b Кафедра истории и философии науки и техники (ИФНТ)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\21252 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ)  |b Кафедра инженерного предпринимательства (ИП)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18857 
801 0 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20211201  |g RCR 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 |u https://www.sgemsocial.org/ssgemlib/spip.php?article3110 
942 |c CF