The Increase in the Yield of Light Fractions During the Catalytic Cracking of C13-C40 Hydrocarbons; Current Organic Synthesis; Vol. 14, iss. 3

Bibliographic Details
Parent link:Current Organic Synthesis.— , 2004-
Vol. 14, iss. 3.— 2017.— [P. 353 - 364]
Corporate Author: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт природных ресурсов (ИПР) Кафедра химической технологии топлива и химической кибернетики (ХТТ)
Other Authors: Ivashkina E. N. Elena Nikolaevna, Nazarova G. Yu. Galina Yurievna, Ivanchina E. D. Emilia Dmitrievna, Belinskaya N. S. Natalia Sergeevna, Ivanov S. Yu. Stanislav Yurjevich
Summary:Title screen
Background: The work performed constituted thermodynamic kinetic analysis of the chemical transformations of C13-C40 hydrocarbons during the catalytic cracking process.Objective: The objective of the work was to increase the yield of light fractions during the catalytic cracking of C13-C40 hydrocarbons.Method: Laboratory research to determine the structural grouped and individual composition of feedstock and products of catalytic cracking using liquid-adsorption and gas-liquid chromatography, chromato-mass spectrometry, n-d-m- and Hazelwood methods allowed a list to be made of catalytic cracking process reactions. Using Density Functional Theory, the thermodynamic parameters of the process reactions were determined and a formalized scheme of hydrocarbons transformations compiled based upon which the kinetic model of the process was documented and implemented programmatically. The determination of kinetic parameters of the reactions was carried out by solving the inverse kinetic problem using experimental data from an industrial plant and laboratory studies.
Results: Using the kinetic model of the process, a study was conducted to determine the temperature in the catalytic cracking reactor aimed at achieving a process that yields gasoline fraction and light gas oil fraction. To achieve an optimum yield of high-octane (94.8) gasoline from catalytic cracking (59.30%), it is necessary to maintain the temperature at the exit of the ballistic separator at 530 °C. To achieve an optimum yield of light gas oil from catalytic cracking (12.09%), it is necessary to maintain the temperature at the outlet from the ballistic separator at the level of 520 °C.Conclusion: The use of a kinetic model of catalytic cracking allowed changes in the concentration of the reactants to be calculated as well as the yield and composition of the catalytic cracking products and ensured the selection of optimum conditions for increasing the yield of gasoline and light gas oil fractions based on group composition of raw material for catalytic cracking.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2174/1570179413666161031121659
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=655293

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 655293
005 20250318120457.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\21312 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\20995 
090 |a 655293 
100 |a 20170824d2017 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a The Increase in the Yield of Light Fractions During the Catalytic Cracking of C13-C40 Hydrocarbons  |f E. N. Ivashkina [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
330 |a Background: The work performed constituted thermodynamic kinetic analysis of the chemical transformations of C13-C40 hydrocarbons during the catalytic cracking process.Objective: The objective of the work was to increase the yield of light fractions during the catalytic cracking of C13-C40 hydrocarbons.Method: Laboratory research to determine the structural grouped and individual composition of feedstock and products of catalytic cracking using liquid-adsorption and gas-liquid chromatography, chromato-mass spectrometry, n-d-m- and Hazelwood methods allowed a list to be made of catalytic cracking process reactions. Using Density Functional Theory, the thermodynamic parameters of the process reactions were determined and a formalized scheme of hydrocarbons transformations compiled based upon which the kinetic model of the process was documented and implemented programmatically. The determination of kinetic parameters of the reactions was carried out by solving the inverse kinetic problem using experimental data from an industrial plant and laboratory studies. 
330 |a Results: Using the kinetic model of the process, a study was conducted to determine the temperature in the catalytic cracking reactor aimed at achieving a process that yields gasoline fraction and light gas oil fraction. To achieve an optimum yield of high-octane (94.8) gasoline from catalytic cracking (59.30%), it is necessary to maintain the temperature at the exit of the ballistic separator at 530 °C. To achieve an optimum yield of light gas oil from catalytic cracking (12.09%), it is necessary to maintain the temperature at the outlet from the ballistic separator at the level of 520 °C.Conclusion: The use of a kinetic model of catalytic cracking allowed changes in the concentration of the reactants to be calculated as well as the yield and composition of the catalytic cracking products and ensured the selection of optimum conditions for increasing the yield of gasoline and light gas oil fractions based on group composition of raw material for catalytic cracking. 
333 |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса 
461 |t Current Organic Synthesis  |d 2004- 
463 |t Vol. 14, iss. 3  |v [P. 353 - 364]  |d 2017 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a нефтепереработка 
610 1 |a каталитический крекинг 
610 1 |a сырье 
610 1 |a кинетические модели 
610 1 |a легкие фракции 
610 1 |a ресурсы 
610 1 |a эффективность 
610 1 |a использование 
610 1 |a advanced petroleum refining 
610 1 |a catalytic cracking 
610 1 |a group composition of raw materials 
610 1 |a kinetic model 
610 1 |a resource efficiency 
701 1 |a Ivashkina  |b E. N.  |c Chemical Engineer  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of technical sciences  |f 1983-  |g Elena Nikolaevna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31275  |9 15453 
701 1 |a Nazarova  |b G. Yu.  |c chemist  |c assistant of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1990-  |g Galina Yurievna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\35588  |9 18757 
701 1 |a Ivanchina  |b E. D.  |c chemist  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of technical sciences  |f 1951-  |g Emilia Dmitrievna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31274 
701 1 |a Belinskaya  |b N. S.  |c chemist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Sciences  |f 1989-  |g Natalia Sergeevna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31267  |9 15445 
701 1 |a Ivanov  |b S. Yu.  |g Stanislav Yurjevich 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Институт природных ресурсов (ИПР)  |b Кафедра химической технологии топлива и химической кибернетики (ХТТ)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18665 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20170824  |g RCR 
856 4 |u https://doi.org/10.2174/1570179413666161031121659 
942 |c CF