Горнозаводские моногорода России
| Parent link: | Горный журнал: научно-технический и производственный журнал.— , 1825- № 1.— 2017.— [С. 4-10] |
|---|---|
| Corporate Author: | |
| Other Authors: | , , , |
| Summary: | Заглавие с экрана Статья посвящена социальным проблемам моногородов, зависимых от градообразующих предприятий горнодобывающей и металлургической отраслей. Выделяется система горнозаводских агломераций-поселений. Предлагаются варианты экономической реорганизации горнозаводских монопоселений. The authors discuss the issues and ways of improvement of monotown territories accommodating mining and metallurgical plants. The range of the problems faced by the single-industry towns due to the direct relation between the town development and the major employer activity is presented along with the factors that govern the economic effi ciency of the major employer. The state of the mining monotowns in Russia is reviewed, and the monotowns are grouped relative to the activity of the major employer (iron ore mining and ferrous metallurgy; coal production; nonferrous metallurgy; uranium extraction and processing; cement production; diamond mining, etc.). The current condition of the single-industry towns in diff erent branches of industry is analyzed. The emphasis is laid on mining settlements in the extreme northern areas where it is necessary to move residents–employees to more comfortable regions after mine closure. It is shown that it is typical of majority of the single-industry towns engaged in the same industrial activity that they generate clusters of settlements, which favors cooperation and integration of personnel and initiates effective pendulum internal migration of residents between unfortunate and fortunate centers of agglomeration. The data on inhabited agglomerations, including mining monotowns, are presented. The discussed scenarios of economical re-arrangement of monotowns are backed by case studies. The authors prove the leading role of the State that administers and supports business activity in the single-industry towns and in adjacent territory (Monotown Development Foundation, establishment of territories of advanced social-andeconomic development, etc.). Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2017.01.01 |
| Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=654845 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa0a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 654845 | ||
| 005 | 20250313140726.0 | ||
| 035 | |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\20532 | ||
| 090 | |a 654845 | ||
| 100 | |a 20170524d2017 k||y0rusy50 ca | ||
| 101 | 0 | |a rus | |
| 102 | |a RU | ||
| 135 | |a drcn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | |a i | |
| 182 | 0 | |a b | |
| 200 | 1 | |a Горнозаводские моногорода России |d Mining monotowns in Russia |f Г. Ю. Боярко [и др.] | |
| 203 | |a Текст |c электронный | ||
| 300 | |a Заглавие с экрана | ||
| 320 | |a [Библиогр.: 15 назв.] | ||
| 330 | |a Статья посвящена социальным проблемам моногородов, зависимых от градообразующих предприятий горнодобывающей и металлургической отраслей. Выделяется система горнозаводских агломераций-поселений. Предлагаются варианты экономической реорганизации горнозаводских монопоселений. | ||
| 330 | |a The authors discuss the issues and ways of improvement of monotown territories accommodating mining and metallurgical plants. The range of the problems faced by the single-industry towns due to the direct relation between the town development and the major employer activity is presented along with the factors that govern the economic effi ciency of the major employer. The state of the mining monotowns in Russia is reviewed, and the monotowns are grouped relative to the activity of the major employer (iron ore mining and ferrous metallurgy; coal production; nonferrous metallurgy; uranium extraction and processing; cement production; diamond mining, etc.). The current condition of the single-industry towns in diff erent branches of industry is analyzed. The emphasis is laid on mining settlements in the extreme northern areas where it is necessary to move residents–employees to more comfortable regions after mine closure. It is shown that it is typical of majority of the single-industry towns engaged in the same industrial activity that they generate clusters of settlements, which favors cooperation and integration of personnel and initiates effective pendulum internal migration of residents between unfortunate and fortunate centers of agglomeration. The data on inhabited agglomerations, including mining monotowns, are presented. The discussed scenarios of economical re-arrangement of monotowns are backed by case studies. The authors prove the leading role of the State that administers and supports business activity in the single-industry towns and in adjacent territory (Monotown Development Foundation, establishment of territories of advanced social-andeconomic development, etc.). | ||
| 333 | |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса | ||
| 461 | |t Горный журнал |o научно-технический и производственный журнал |d 1825- | ||
| 463 | |t № 1 |v [С. 4-10] |d 2017 | ||
| 510 | 1 | |a Mining monotowns in Russia |z eng | |
| 610 | 1 | |a электронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a труды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | |a горнозаводские предприятия | |
| 610 | 1 | |a моногорода | |
| 610 | 1 | |a агломерация | |
| 610 | 1 | |a диверсификация | |
| 610 | 1 | |a экономика | |
| 610 | 1 | |a государственное регулирование | |
| 610 | 1 | |a mining plants | |
| 610 | 1 | |a monotown | |
| 610 | 1 | |a agglomeration | |
| 610 | 1 | |a economical diversifi cation | |
| 610 | 1 | |a governmental regulation | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Боярко |b Г. Ю. |c экономист |c заведующий кафедрой Томского политехнического университета, доктор экономических наук |f 1954- |g Григорий Юрьевич |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\26105 |9 11935 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Матюгина |b Э. Г. |c экономист |c профессор Томского политехнического университета, доктор экономических наук |f 1971- |g Элеонора Григорьевна |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33529 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Пожарницкая |b О. В. |c экономист |c доцент Томского политехнического университета, кандидат экономических наук |f 1972- |g Ольга Вячеславовна |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\30204 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Гринкевич |b Л. С. |g Лариса Сергеевна | |
| 712 | 0 | 2 | |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) |b Институт природных ресурсов (ИПР) |b Кафедра экономики природных ресурсов (ЭПР) |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18668 |
| 801 | 2 | |a RU |b 63413507 |c 20170524 |g RCR | |
| 856 | 4 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2017.01.01 | |
| 942 | |c CF | ||