Impact Assessment and Consumer Behavior: Russian Evidence; Innovation Management and Education Excellence Vision 2020: from Regional Development Sustainability to Global Economic Growth
| Parent link: | Innovation Management and Education Excellence Vision 2020: from Regional Development Sustainability to Global Economic Growth.— 2016.— [P. 3516-3523] |
|---|---|
| Autore principale: | |
| Enti autori: | , |
| Altri autori: | , |
| Riassunto: | Title screen In the article impact assessment as an instrument of economic policy has been analyzed in terms of the basic institutional concepts and notions of theory of routine behavior. Neither European nor Russian assessment practice is not complied with these principles. In detail results of two laws concerning consumer behavior were examined: consumer protection in case of content services and anti-smoking law. The first regulation problem was resolved not by the intervention of the legislator but by cellular carriers. The second law actually turned to be low-performing. We suggest the need to implement behavioral principles in the impact assessment of drafts to improve the procedure performance. |
| Lingua: | inglese |
| Pubblicazione: |
2016
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-RnYQdv7tJbX2ZuMEt0SFB5Qm8/view?pli=3516 |
| Natura: | Elettronico Capitolo di libro |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=654798 |
| Riassunto: | Title screen In the article impact assessment as an instrument of economic policy has been analyzed in terms of the basic institutional concepts and notions of theory of routine behavior. Neither European nor Russian assessment practice is not complied with these principles. In detail results of two laws concerning consumer behavior were examined: consumer protection in case of content services and anti-smoking law. The first regulation problem was resolved not by the intervention of the legislator but by cellular carriers. The second law actually turned to be low-performing. We suggest the need to implement behavioral principles in the impact assessment of drafts to improve the procedure performance. |
|---|