Impact Assessment and Consumer Behavior: Russian Evidence

Бібліографічні деталі
Parent link:Innovation Management and Education Excellence Vision 2020: from Regional Development Sustainability to Global Economic Growth.— 2016.— [P. 3516-3523]
Автор: Ryzhkova M. V. Marina Vyacheslavovna
Співавтори: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ) Кафедра экономики (ЭКОН), Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ) Кафедра менеджмента (МЕН)
Інші автори: Zhdanova A. B. Anna Borisovna, Kanov V. I. Viktor Ivanovich
Резюме:Title screen
In the article impact assessment as an instrument of economic policy has been analyzed in terms of the basic institutional concepts and notions of theory of routine behavior. Neither European nor Russian assessment practice is not complied with these principles. In detail results of two laws concerning consumer behavior were examined: consumer protection in case of content services and anti-smoking law. The first regulation problem was resolved not by the intervention of the legislator but by cellular carriers. The second law actually turned to be low-performing. We suggest the need to implement behavioral principles in the impact assessment of drafts to improve the procedure performance.
Мова:Англійська
Опубліковано: 2016
Предмети:
Онлайн доступ:https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-RnYQdv7tJbX2ZuMEt0SFB5Qm8/view?pli=3516
Формат: Електронний ресурс Частина з книги
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=654798
Опис
Резюме:Title screen
In the article impact assessment as an instrument of economic policy has been analyzed in terms of the basic institutional concepts and notions of theory of routine behavior. Neither European nor Russian assessment practice is not complied with these principles. In detail results of two laws concerning consumer behavior were examined: consumer protection in case of content services and anti-smoking law. The first regulation problem was resolved not by the intervention of the legislator but by cellular carriers. The second law actually turned to be low-performing. We suggest the need to implement behavioral principles in the impact assessment of drafts to improve the procedure performance.