Historical and theoretical traditions of knowledge in management systems

Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Parent link:SGEM. 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts: conference proceedings, Albena, Bulgariaм, Aug. 24-31, 2016.— , 2016
Bk. 3, vol. 2.— 2016.— [P. 685-690]
Erakunde egilea: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет
Beste egile batzuk: Goncharenko M. V. Mark Vasilievich, Rogotneva E. N. Elena Nikolaevna, Demidova O. M. Olga Mikhailovna, Michalzhova E.
Gaia:Title screen
Any management model used for achieving goals of an organization is conditioned by socioeconomic, ideological and scientific paradigms. These paradigms are relevant at a certain historical moment, but it doesn’t mean that they didn’t exist earlier. On the contrary, they were known and used in earlier times. The authors’ main aim is to reveal and determine the regularity, which makes it possible to use a certain management model at a given moment of the historical development as the most suitable one. Besides, the authors aimed to determine, how the knowledge of the inner nature of people’s relations influenced the development of management systems. To achieve this aim it is necessary to limit this research by the fields studied, as well as by the time periods of the management models. The authors compare the methods used to rule ancient slaves in Rome Empire with the methods of management in contemporary, modern management systems. The book ‘How to Manage Your Slaves. Marcus Sidonius Falx’ by Jerry Toner [1] serves as a starting point of the research. The authors claim that even the slavery as a social model of management disappeared long time ago, the elements of the ancient slavery management system can be found even in modern management systems. It can especially be found in the subordination “a manager-a subordinated”.
Hizkuntza:ingelesa
Argitaratua: 2016
Gaiak:
Sarrera elektronikoa:https://sgemsocial.org/ssgemlib/spip.php?article3148
Formatua: Baliabide elektronikoa Liburu kapitulua
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=654119

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 654119
005 20250910144216.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\19639 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\14862 
090 |a 654119 
100 |a 20170411d2016 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
135 |a drgn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Historical and theoretical traditions of knowledge in management systems  |f M. V. Goncharenko [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
330 |a Any management model used for achieving goals of an organization is conditioned by socioeconomic, ideological and scientific paradigms. These paradigms are relevant at a certain historical moment, but it doesn’t mean that they didn’t exist earlier. On the contrary, they were known and used in earlier times. The authors’ main aim is to reveal and determine the regularity, which makes it possible to use a certain management model at a given moment of the historical development as the most suitable one. Besides, the authors aimed to determine, how the knowledge of the inner nature of people’s relations influenced the development of management systems. To achieve this aim it is necessary to limit this research by the fields studied, as well as by the time periods of the management models. The authors compare the methods used to rule ancient slaves in Rome Empire with the methods of management in contemporary, modern management systems. The book ‘How to Manage Your Slaves. Marcus Sidonius Falx’ by Jerry Toner [1] serves as a starting point of the research. The authors claim that even the slavery as a social model of management disappeared long time ago, the elements of the ancient slavery management system can be found even in modern management systems. It can especially be found in the subordination “a manager-a subordinated”. 
461 1 |t SGEM. 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts  |o conference proceedings, Albena, Bulgariaм, Aug. 24-31, 2016  |d 2016 
463 1 |t Bk. 3, vol. 2  |v [P. 685-690]  |d 2016 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a management 
610 1 |a управление 
610 1 |a социальный статус 
610 1 |a социальные роли 
610 1 |a модели управления 
701 1 |a Goncharenko  |b M. V.  |c specialist in the field of psychology and pedagogy  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences  |f 1973-  |g Mark Vasilievich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33597 
701 1 |a Rogotneva  |b E. N.  |c Sociologist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of philosophical sciences  |f 1976-  |g Elena Nikolaevna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33824  |9 17418 
701 1 |a Demidova  |b O. M.  |c Linguist  |c Senior Lecturer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1978-  |g Olga Mikhailovna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31682  |9 15813 
701 1 |a Michalzhova  |b E. 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |c (2009- )  |9 26305 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20211201  |g RCR 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 |u https://sgemsocial.org/ssgemlib/spip.php?article3148 
942 |c CF