Design as Means of Countering Vandalism; The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS); Vol. 19 : Lifelong Wellbeing in the World (WELLSO 2016)
| Parent link: | The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS) Vol. 19 : Lifelong Wellbeing in the World (WELLSO 2016).— 2017.— [P. 396-403] |
|---|---|
| Körperschaft: | |
| Weitere Verfasser: | , , , , |
| Zusammenfassung: | Title screen In this research the design in hardening of aesthetically valuable objects against vandalism is analyzed. There are two distinguished forms of vandalism: meaningless and meaningful ones. The purpose of this research is to develop design methods that enhance protection of aesthetically valuable objects against vandals. The harmonious development of the society is the main goal of culture. Actions that prevent movement to the harmonious development of society are treated as vandalism in this study, in a broad sense of the word. Meaningful vandalism is aimed at the destruction or desecration of objects with aesthetic or cultural value. The counteraction against the meaningful vandalism cannot be realized through the design. The research of vandalism motivation shows that meaningless vandalism does not have a pronounced goal. The main characteristic of meaningless vandalism is a destruction of the most at the lowest cost. It is shown in the study, how to resist the meaningless vandalism by using the objects of design. The relationship of design and mindless vandalism is not linear. Inharmonious design can provoke this type of vandalism. It is important to avoid stress and attention concentrators, when designing aesthetically valuable objects. Aimless (mindless) production is a kind of meaningless vandalism. Trash is the lower border of mindless vandalism and the upper border is meaningful vandalism. Violation of physical and spiritual ecology is the main source of mindless vandalism. |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2017
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.01.53 http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/37275 |
| Format: | Elektronisch Buchkapitel |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=653397 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nla2a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 653397 | ||
| 005 | 20231227155730.0 | ||
| 035 | |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\18838 | ||
| 035 | |a RU\TPU\network\18835 | ||
| 090 | |a 653397 | ||
| 100 | |a 20170301a2017 k y0engy50 ba | ||
| 101 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 105 | |a y z 100zy | ||
| 135 | |a drcn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | |a i | |
| 182 | 0 | |a b | |
| 200 | 1 | |a Design as Means of Countering Vandalism |f A. Sokolov [et al.] | |
| 203 | |a Text |c electronic | ||
| 300 | |a Title screen | ||
| 320 | |a [References: p. 403 (8 tit.)] | ||
| 330 | |a In this research the design in hardening of aesthetically valuable objects against vandalism is analyzed. There are two distinguished forms of vandalism: meaningless and meaningful ones. The purpose of this research is to develop design methods that enhance protection of aesthetically valuable objects against vandals. The harmonious development of the society is the main goal of culture. Actions that prevent movement to the harmonious development of society are treated as vandalism in this study, in a broad sense of the word. Meaningful vandalism is aimed at the destruction or desecration of objects with aesthetic or cultural value. The counteraction against the meaningful vandalism cannot be realized through the design. The research of vandalism motivation shows that meaningless vandalism does not have a pronounced goal. The main characteristic of meaningless vandalism is a destruction of the most at the lowest cost. It is shown in the study, how to resist the meaningless vandalism by using the objects of design. The relationship of design and mindless vandalism is not linear. Inharmonious design can provoke this type of vandalism. It is important to avoid stress and attention concentrators, when designing aesthetically valuable objects. Aimless (mindless) production is a kind of meaningless vandalism. Trash is the lower border of mindless vandalism and the upper border is meaningful vandalism. Violation of physical and spiritual ecology is the main source of mindless vandalism. | ||
| 461 | 0 | |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\11959 |t The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS) | |
| 463 | 0 | |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\18772 |t Vol. 19 : Lifelong Wellbeing in the World (WELLSO 2016) |o III International Scientific Symposium, 11-16 September 2016, Tomsk, Russian Federation |o [proceedings] |f National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU) ; eds. F. Casati ; G. A. Barysheva |v [P. 396-403] |d 2017 | |
| 610 | 1 | |a электронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a труды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | |a vandalism protection | |
| 610 | 1 | |a design | |
| 610 | 1 | |a aesthetically valuable objects | |
| 610 | 1 | |a motivation | |
| 610 | 1 | |a вандализм | |
| 610 | 1 | |a дизайн | |
| 610 | 1 | |a ценные объекты | |
| 610 | 1 | |a мотивация | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Sokolov |b A. | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Kukhta |b M. S. |c Specialist in the field of industrial design |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of philosophical sciences |f 1963- |g Maria Sergeevna |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\32999 |9 16844 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Kornienko |b M. | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Kondratyeva |b Y. | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Kukhta |b A. | |
| 712 | 0 | 2 | |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) |b Институт кибернетики (ИК) |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18397 |
| 801 | 2 | |a RU |b 63413507 |c 20180220 |g RCR | |
| 856 | 4 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.01.53 | |
| 856 | 4 | |u http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/37275 | |
| 942 | |c CF | ||