Scottish Philosophy in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries; Philosophical Quarterly; Vol. 66, iss. 265

Opis bibliograficzny
Parent link:Philosophical Quarterly
Vol. 66, iss. 265.— 2016.— [P. 854-855]
1. autor: Fell E. V. Elena Vladimirovna
Korporacja: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ) Кафедра социальных коммуникаций (СК)
Kolejni autorzy: Lukianova N. A. Natalia Aleksandrovna
Streszczenie:Title screen
This is a remarkable collection of essays. The contributors give ample evidence of the vigour and dynamism of philosophical debate in Scotland during the last two centuries. They also show how much of it was concerned with the impact of German Idealism on the philosophical tradition of the Scottish Enlightenment. Consider, for example, Dixon's analysis of Thomas Brown's contribution to philosophy and his engagement with Reid's position; Graham's ‘[r]e-examination’ (p. 47) of William Hamilton's reading of Kant, Cousin and Schelling in relation to the theory of Common Sense; Boucher's thorough account of James Frederick Ferrier's attempt to free himself from Scottish Common Sense philosophy and his position as a ‘more sceptical’ idealist than Hegel (p. 160). The uneasy relationship between Scottish philosophy and German Idealism is demonstrated further by Boucher who reminds us of Edward Caird's preference for Kant over Hegel.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
Język:angielski
Wydane: 2016
Hasła przedmiotowe:
Dostęp online:https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqv110
Format: Elektroniczne Rozdział
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=652660
Opis
Streszczenie:Title screen
This is a remarkable collection of essays. The contributors give ample evidence of the vigour and dynamism of philosophical debate in Scotland during the last two centuries. They also show how much of it was concerned with the impact of German Idealism on the philosophical tradition of the Scottish Enlightenment. Consider, for example, Dixon's analysis of Thomas Brown's contribution to philosophy and his engagement with Reid's position; Graham's ‘[r]e-examination’ (p. 47) of William Hamilton's reading of Kant, Cousin and Schelling in relation to the theory of Common Sense; Boucher's thorough account of James Frederick Ferrier's attempt to free himself from Scottish Common Sense philosophy and his position as a ‘more sceptical’ idealist than Hegel (p. 160). The uneasy relationship between Scottish philosophy and German Idealism is demonstrated further by Boucher who reminds us of Edward Caird's preference for Kant over Hegel.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
DOI:10.1093/pq/pqv110