Investment Attractiveness of Closed-end Real Estate Investment Funds in Russia: Factor Score Evaluation; Advances in Computer Science Research; Vol. 37 : Education, Management, Computer and Medicine (EMCM 2016)

Detaylı Bibliyografya
Parent link:Advances in Computer Science Research: Scientific Journal
Vol. 37 : Education, Management, Computer and Medicine (EMCM 2016).— 2016.— [P. 904-907]
Kurumsal yazarlar: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ) Кафедра менеджмента (МЕН), Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ) Кафедра экономики (ЭКОН)
Diğer Yazarlar: Antonova I. S. Irina Sergeevna, Negodina O. A. Olesya Anatoljevna, Koptelova E. S. Ekaterina Stanislavovna, Spitsina (Spitsyna) L. Yu. Lubov Yurievna, Popova S. N. Svetlana Nikolaevna, Vavilov D. D. Danil Dmitrievich
Özet:Title screen
Closed-end real estate investment fund iscurrently one of the most popular instruments of collectiveinvestments in Russia. In this article, we have designed afactor score method to evaluate the investmentattractiveness of closed-end real estate investment funds asthe objective of the research. The method differs fromothers in three elements of attractiveness evaluation: thereal estate market, asset management company, and assetportfolio. We suggest evaluating each element by theappropriate factors. In the research, all the factors aregrouped and systemized as variable-based and attributebasedfactors in the three elements of investmentattractiveness. The evaluation is based on the expertscores and factor criteria. Results of the research show thedifferences between preferences of conservative, moderateand aggressive investors when they invest in closed-endinvestment fund. The desighed method serves for differenttypes of investors to express their attitude to a specific realestate closed-end fund.
Dil:İngilizce
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: 2016
Konular:
Online Erişim:http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/emcs-16.2016.221
Materyal Türü: xMaterials Elektronik Kitap Bölümü
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=652540

MARC

LEADER 00000naa2a2200000 4500
001 652540
005 20250902155857.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\17869 
090 |a 652540 
100 |a 20170116d2016 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a FR 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Investment Attractiveness of Closed-end Real Estate Investment Funds in Russia: Factor Score Evaluation  |f I. S. Antonova [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: p. 907 (14 tit.)] 
330 |a Closed-end real estate investment fund iscurrently one of the most popular instruments of collectiveinvestments in Russia. In this article, we have designed afactor score method to evaluate the investmentattractiveness of closed-end real estate investment funds asthe objective of the research. The method differs fromothers in three elements of attractiveness evaluation: thereal estate market, asset management company, and assetportfolio. We suggest evaluating each element by theappropriate factors. In the research, all the factors aregrouped and systemized as variable-based and attributebasedfactors in the three elements of investmentattractiveness. The evaluation is based on the expertscores and factor criteria. Results of the research show thedifferences between preferences of conservative, moderateand aggressive investors when they invest in closed-endinvestment fund. The desighed method serves for differenttypes of investors to express their attitude to a specific realestate closed-end fund. 
461 1 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\18167  |t Advances in Computer Science Research  |o Scientific Journal 
463 1 |t Vol. 37 : Education, Management, Computer and Medicine (EMCM 2016)  |o 6th International Conference, Jan 1-3, 2016, Shenyang, China  |v [P. 904-907]  |d 2016 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a паевые фонды 
610 1 |a инвестиционные фонды 
610 1 |a рынок 
610 1 |a недвижимость 
610 1 |a активы 
701 1 |a Antonova  |b I. S.  |c specialist in the field of management  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of economic sciences  |f 1985-  |g Irina Sergeevna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31961  |9 16021 
701 1 |a Negodina  |b O. A.  |g Olesya Anatoljevna 
701 1 |a Koptelova  |b E. S.  |g Ekaterina Stanislavovna 
701 1 |a Spitsina (Spitsyna)  |b L. Yu.  |c Economist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of economic sciences  |f 1976-  |g Lubov Yurievna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\35245  |9 18510 
701 1 |a Popova  |b S. N.  |c specialist in the field of management  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of economic sciences  |f 1976-  |g Svetlana Nikolaevna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\37770  |9 20508 
701 1 |a Vavilov  |b D. D.  |g Danil Dmitrievich 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ)  |b Кафедра менеджмента (МЕН)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18855 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ)  |b Кафедра экономики (ЭКОН)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18375 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20170127  |g RCR 
856 4 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/emcs-16.2016.221 
942 |c CF