Невозможность исполнения обязательства в гражданском праве Турции и Швейцарии в контексте реформы ГК РФ: особенности рецепции и развития Ч. 2; Вестник Томского государственного университета. Право; № 2 (20)
| Parent link: | Вестник Томского государственного университета. Право/ Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет (ТГУ).— , 2011- № 2 (20).— 2016.— [С. 121-132] |
|---|---|
| Autor Principal: | |
| Autor Corporativo: | |
| Summary: | Заглавие с экрана Проводится анализ становления и развития институтов невозможности исполнения обязательства в Турции, Швейцарии, Германии и России. Исследование позволяет заключить: в гражданском законодательстве Турции нашла закрепление и продолжает развиваться заимствованная из швейцарского гражданского права и критикуемая современной европейской цивилистикой пандектная модель рассматриваемого института, от которой в 2002 г. отказался немецкий законодатель и лишь отдельные элементы которой реализованы в ГК РФ. The article is devoted to comparative analysis of creation and development of the institutions of impossibility of performance of an obligation in Turkish, Swiss, German and Russian law. Amendments to Russian Civil Code in relation to impossibility of performance which came into force on June, 1 2015 are estimated. Author gives the recommendations for the future development of Russian institution of impossibility of performance taking into consideration the results of the same institutions' reforms in Turkish and German law dated 2012 and 2002, respectively, and current reform of Swiss Code of Obligations. This research is relevant due to features of studies legal institution which can be called as a «field of struggle» between different legal traditions gradually taking the form of harmonization. It was created on the basis of the doctrine of the pandect law school in the end of XIX century. So called pandect model of impossibility of performance of an obligation by German civilest Friedrich Mommsen was adopted literally or with the minor modifications by most of the countries of the Romano-Germanic legal systems during the XIX century. For example, it was realized in Swiss Code of Obligations dated 1912 and - by copying of the French version of the latter - in Turkish Code of Obligations dated 1926. Currently the institution of impossibility of performance of the obligations are under the reform influenced by the such lex mercatoria as UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts, Principles of European Contract Law and Draft Common Frame of Reference. These soft law acts were created taking into consideration of the approach of the Anglo-Saxon law to the regulation of private relationship. Thus, studied legal institution can be interesting for all those interested in the phenomenon of legal globalization. |
| Idioma: | ruso |
| Publicado: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Acceso en liña: | http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/22253513/20/14 |
| Formato: | Electrónico Capítulo de libro |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=652370 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa0a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 652370 | ||
| 005 | 20250331160615.0 | ||
| 035 | |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\17654 | ||
| 035 | |a RU\TPU\network\13483 | ||
| 090 | |a 652370 | ||
| 100 | |a 20161220d2016 k||y0rusy50 ca | ||
| 101 | 0 | |a rus | |
| 102 | |a RU | ||
| 135 | |a drcn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | |a i | |
| 182 | 0 | |a b | |
| 200 | 1 | |a Невозможность исполнения обязательства в гражданском праве Турции и Швейцарии в контексте реформы ГК РФ: особенности рецепции и развития Ч. 2 |d Impossibility of performance of an obligation in Turkish and Swiss civil law in the context of Russian civil code reform: features of reception and development P. 2 |f Е. С. Терди | |
| 203 | |a Текст |c электронный | ||
| 300 | |a Заглавие с экрана | ||
| 320 | |a [Библиогр.: с. 131-132 (19 назв.)] | ||
| 330 | |a Проводится анализ становления и развития институтов невозможности исполнения обязательства в Турции, Швейцарии, Германии и России. Исследование позволяет заключить: в гражданском законодательстве Турции нашла закрепление и продолжает развиваться заимствованная из швейцарского гражданского права и критикуемая современной европейской цивилистикой пандектная модель рассматриваемого института, от которой в 2002 г. отказался немецкий законодатель и лишь отдельные элементы которой реализованы в ГК РФ. | ||
| 330 | |a The article is devoted to comparative analysis of creation and development of the institutions of impossibility of performance of an obligation in Turkish, Swiss, German and Russian law. Amendments to Russian Civil Code in relation to impossibility of performance which came into force on June, 1 2015 are estimated. Author gives the recommendations for the future development of Russian institution of impossibility of performance taking into consideration the results of the same institutions' reforms in Turkish and German law dated 2012 and 2002, respectively, and current reform of Swiss Code of Obligations. This research is relevant due to features of studies legal institution which can be called as a «field of struggle» between different legal traditions gradually taking the form of harmonization. It was created on the basis of the doctrine of the pandect law school in the end of XIX century. So called pandect model of impossibility of performance of an obligation by German civilest Friedrich Mommsen was adopted literally or with the minor modifications by most of the countries of the Romano-Germanic legal systems during the XIX century. For example, it was realized in Swiss Code of Obligations dated 1912 and - by copying of the French version of the latter - in Turkish Code of Obligations dated 1926. Currently the institution of impossibility of performance of the obligations are under the reform influenced by the such lex mercatoria as UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts, Principles of European Contract Law and Draft Common Frame of Reference. These soft law acts were created taking into consideration of the approach of the Anglo-Saxon law to the regulation of private relationship. Thus, studied legal institution can be interesting for all those interested in the phenomenon of legal globalization. | ||
| 461 | |t Вестник Томского государственного университета. Право |f Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет (ТГУ) |d 2011- | ||
| 463 | |t № 2 (20) |v [С. 121-132] |d 2016 | ||
| 510 | 1 | |a Impossibility of performance of an obligation in Turkish and Swiss civil law in the context of Russian civil code reform: features of reception and development P. 2 |z eng | |
| 610 | 1 | |a электронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a труды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | |a обязательства | |
| 610 | 1 | |a обязательственное право | |
| 610 | 1 | |a Турция | |
| 610 | 1 | |a Швейцария | |
| 610 | 1 | |a Германия | |
| 610 | 1 | |a реформы | |
| 610 | 1 | |a Russian Federation | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Терди |b Е. С. |c специалист в области права |c доцент Томского политехнического университета, кандидат юридических наук |f 1986- |g Екатерина Сергеевна |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\36711 |9 19750 | |
| 712 | 0 | 2 | |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет |b Институт природных ресурсов |b Кафедра экономики природных ресурсов |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18668 |9 27121 |
| 801 | 2 | |a RU |b 63413507 |c 20161220 |g RCR | |
| 856 | 4 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/22253513/20/14 | |
| 942 | |c CF | ||