|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000naa0a2200000 4500 |
| 001 |
651494 |
| 005 |
20250827162345.0 |
| 035 |
|
|
|a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\16743
|
| 090 |
|
|
|a 651494
|
| 100 |
|
|
|a 20161115d2015 k y0rusy50 ca
|
| 101 |
0 |
|
|a rus
|
| 102 |
|
|
|a RU
|
| 135 |
|
|
|a drgn ---uucaa
|
| 181 |
|
0 |
|a i
|
| 182 |
|
0 |
|a b
|
| 200 |
1 |
|
|a Эстетическое бытие как "отрешенное бытие" по следам интерпретации Г. Г. Шпета
|d Esthetic existence as "an estranged existence": in the wake of G. G. Shpet's interpretation
|f Н. А. Колодий
|
| 203 |
|
|
|a Текст
|c электронный
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a Заглавие с экрана
|
| 320 |
|
|
|a [Библиогр.: 22 назв.]
|
| 330 |
|
|
|a In article reconstruction of a historical and philosophical context of the concept of thefamous Russian thinker is offered; positions of philosophers–antagonists of G.G. Shpet areinvestigated and the range of the subsequent esthetic and cultural reflections is consistentlyrestored. Culture – in interpretation of the understanding philosophy of culture – as a middlezone. The culture phenomenon is interpreted as something that is "between" a subjectvalid, a thing and a subject ideally imaginable, possible. The esthetics defined as area of"an estranged existence" reflects in G.G. Shpet's position. We do not go departing from"the valid existence". We talk about such prospect of vision that is enriched with experienceof experience of the world by the subject setting and forming new meanings. On theone hand, Shpet has an obvious sending to data of sensual reality; on the other hand, thethird type of existence is – intermediate – makes the thinker to take it out of a context ofthe practical utilitarian purposes. Shpet considers that it is necessary for the birth of a workof art that concrete "sense" surely corresponded to certain "value". It is necessary in thatdegree in which the maintenance of "value" is modified through "sense". From here actually"poetic function" is born. Context reconstruction – a complex problem. During differenteras it was solved also by foreign researchers of Shpet’s works, and – domestic researchersof works of the Russian philosopher. But also today it is necessary to state aninaccessibility of the similar purpose and necessity of authentic reconstruction of this context.
|
| 463 |
|
1 |
|t Феноменолого-онтологический замысел Г. Г. Шпета и гуманитарные проекты XX-XXI веков
|o Г. Г. Шпет/Compehensio. Шестые Шпетовские чтения
|o материалы международной научной конференции, 1-7 июня 2015 г., Томск
|f Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет (ТГУ), под ред. О. Г. Мазаева
|v [С. 181-190]
|d 2015
|
| 510 |
1 |
|
|a Esthetic existence as "an estranged existence": in the wake of G.G. Shpet's interpretation
|z eng
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a электронный ресурс
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a труды учёных ТПУ
|
| 610 |
1 |
|
|a бытие
|
| 700 |
|
1 |
|a Колодий
|b Н. А.
|c специалист в области культурологии и социальной коммуникации
|c профессор Томского политехнического университета, кандидат философских наук
|f 1958-
|g Наталия Андреевна
|3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\27134
|9 12674
|
| 712 |
0 |
2 |
|a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)
|b Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ)
|b Кафедра социальных коммуникаций (СК)
|3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\21254
|
| 801 |
|
2 |
|a RU
|b 63413507
|c 20161115
|g RCR
|
| 856 |
4 |
|
|u http://fsf.tsu.ru/wp_test/wp-content/uploads/spet_2015/Spet_conf2016.pdf#page=181
|
| 942 |
|
|
|c CF
|
