Meaning Making in Communication Processes: The Role of a Human Agency; Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences; Vol. 200 : Language and culture

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
Parent link:Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Vol. 200 : Language and culture.— 2015.— [P. 614-617]
المؤلف الرئيسي: Lukianova N. A. Natalia Aleksandrovna
مؤلف مشترك: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ) Кафедра социальных коммуникаций (СК)
مؤلفون آخرون: Fell E. V. Elena Vladimirovna
الملخص:Title screen
Social theorists often neglect the fact that human beings are not only recipients but also producers of cultural meanings. Peirce's theory of semiosis highlights the active character of human agency. Introducing the notion of interpretant into semiotics, Pierce consideres the process of interpretation or interpretive thought to be a condition of signification, which necessarily involves an interpreting agent, a meaning-making human being. This paper offers a comparative analysis of Peirce's and Eco's theories of semiosis and examines the role of an interpreting agent involved in the semiotic process which is only possible in communication.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
اللغة:الإنجليزية
منشور في: 2015
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.047
التنسيق: الكتروني فصل الكتاب
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=650515

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 650515
005 20250904093433.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\15733 
090 |a 650515 
100 |a 20161007d2015 k||y0engy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a NL 
135 |a drgn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Meaning Making in Communication Processes: The Role of a Human Agency  |f N. A. Lukianova, E. V. Fell 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: 13 tit.] 
330 |a Social theorists often neglect the fact that human beings are not only recipients but also producers of cultural meanings. Peirce's theory of semiosis highlights the active character of human agency. Introducing the notion of interpretant into semiotics, Pierce consideres the process of interpretation or interpretive thought to be a condition of signification, which necessarily involves an interpreting agent, a meaning-making human being. This paper offers a comparative analysis of Peirce's and Eco's theories of semiosis and examines the role of an interpreting agent involved in the semiotic process which is only possible in communication. 
333 |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса 
461 0 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\2898  |t Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 
463 |t Vol. 200 : Language and culture  |o The XXVI Annual International Academic Conference, 27–30 October 2015  |o [proceedings]  |v [P. 614-617]  |d 2015 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a коммуникации 
700 1 |a Lukianova  |b N. A.  |c specialist in the field of psychology and law  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of philosophy sciences  |f 1971-  |g Natalia Aleksandrovna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33131  |9 16952 
701 1 |a Fell  |b E. V.  |c specialist in the field of law  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1975-  |g Elena Vladimirovna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33614 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ)  |b Кафедра социальных коммуникаций (СК)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\21254 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20161007  |g RCR 
856 4 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.047 
942 |c CF