Analysis of physical processes via imaging vectors
| Parent link: | IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering Vol. 135 : Issues of Physics and Technology in Science, Industry and Medicine.— 2016.— [012051, 6 p.] |
|---|---|
| Автор: | |
| Співавтор: | |
| Інші автори: | , |
| Резюме: | Title screen Practically, all modeling processes in one way or another are random. The foremost formulated theoretical foundation embraces Markov processes, being represented in different forms. Markov processes are characterized as a random process that undergoes transitions from one state to another on a state space, whereas the probability distribution of the next state depends only on the current state and not on the sequence of events that preceded it. In the Markov processes the proposition (model) of the future by no means changes in the event of the expansion and/or strong information progression relative to preceding time. Basically, modeling physical fields involves process changing in time, i.e. non-stationay processes. In this case, the application of Laplace transformation provides unjustified description complications. Transition to other possibilities results in explicit simplification. The method of imaging vectors renders constructive mathematical models and necessary transition in the modeling process and analysis itself. The flexibility of the model itself using polynomial basis leads to the possible rapid transition of the mathematical model and further analysis acceleration. It should be noted that the mathematical description permits operator representation. Conversely, operator representation of the structures, algorithms and data processing procedures significantly improve the flexibility of the modeling process. |
| Опубліковано: |
2016
|
| Предмети: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/135/1/012051 http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/34842 |
| Формат: | Електронний ресурс Частина з книги |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=650339 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nla2a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 650339 | ||
| 005 | 20231101134619.0 | ||
| 035 | |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\15557 | ||
| 035 | |a RU\TPU\network\15556 | ||
| 090 | |a 650339 | ||
| 100 | |a 20161003a2016 k y0engy50 ba | ||
| 101 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 102 | |a GB | ||
| 105 | |a y z 100zy | ||
| 135 | |a drgn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | |a i | |
| 182 | 0 | |a b | |
| 200 | 1 | |a Analysis of physical processes via imaging vectors |f V. Volovodenko, N. A. Efremova, V. I. Efremov | |
| 203 | |a Text |c electronic | ||
| 300 | |a Title screen | ||
| 320 | |a [References: 6 tit.] | ||
| 330 | |a Practically, all modeling processes in one way or another are random. The foremost formulated theoretical foundation embraces Markov processes, being represented in different forms. Markov processes are characterized as a random process that undergoes transitions from one state to another on a state space, whereas the probability distribution of the next state depends only on the current state and not on the sequence of events that preceded it. In the Markov processes the proposition (model) of the future by no means changes in the event of the expansion and/or strong information progression relative to preceding time. Basically, modeling physical fields involves process changing in time, i.e. non-stationay processes. In this case, the application of Laplace transformation provides unjustified description complications. Transition to other possibilities results in explicit simplification. The method of imaging vectors renders constructive mathematical models and necessary transition in the modeling process and analysis itself. The flexibility of the model itself using polynomial basis leads to the possible rapid transition of the mathematical model and further analysis acceleration. It should be noted that the mathematical description permits operator representation. Conversely, operator representation of the structures, algorithms and data processing procedures significantly improve the flexibility of the modeling process. | ||
| 461 | 0 | |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\2008 |t IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering | |
| 463 | 0 | |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\15011 |t Vol. 135 : Issues of Physics and Technology in Science, Industry and Medicine |o VIII International Scientific Conference, 1–3 June 2016, Tomsk, Russia |o [proceedings] |v [012051, 6 p.] |d 2016 | |
| 610 | 1 | |a электронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a труды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | |a физические процессы | |
| 610 | 1 | |a визуализация | |
| 610 | 1 | |a марковские процессы | |
| 610 | 1 | |a математические модели | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Volovodenko |b V. | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Efremova |b N. A. |c physicist |c senior lecturer of Tomsk Polytechnic University |f 1954- |g Nataliya Aleksandrovna |2 stltpush |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\37368 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Efremov |b V. I. |c physicist |c engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University |f 1978- |g Vadim Igorevich |2 stltpush |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\37369 | |
| 712 | 0 | 2 | |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) |b Физико-технический институт (ФТИ) |b Кафедра общей физики (ОФ) |h 136 |2 stltpush |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18734 |
| 801 | 2 | |a RU |b 63413507 |c 20170120 |g RCR | |
| 856 | 4 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/135/1/012051 | |
| 856 | 4 | |u http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/34842 | |
| 942 | |c CF | ||