Types of Discourse Markers: their Ethnocultural Diversity in Scientific Text
| Parent link: | Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Vol. 215 : International Education and Cross-Cultural Communication, Problems and Solutions, (IECC 2015).— 2015.— [P. 266-272] |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Corporate Author: | |
| Other Authors: | |
| Summary: | Title screen The paper aims to reveal the role of ethnolinguistic and discursive factors that determine the direction of discursive units’ functioning in an academic text. The issue is dealt with on the basis of academic texts in the German and Russian languages belonging to geological type of academic discourse. The following functional types of discursive markers (DMs) are distinguished: 1) the markers ensuring text coherence, 2) the markers disclosing a speaker's attitude to an utterance, and 3) the markers reflecting the process of interaction between the author and the reader. This article is devoted to consideration of the second group DMs. Comparative analysis of using DMsdiscloses specific ways of presenting academic knowledge and the influence of ethnolinguistic models of academic discourse organization on this variety. Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.633 http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/33674 |
| Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=650072 |
| Summary: | Title screen The paper aims to reveal the role of ethnolinguistic and discursive factors that determine the direction of discursive units’ functioning in an academic text. The issue is dealt with on the basis of academic texts in the German and Russian languages belonging to geological type of academic discourse. The following functional types of discursive markers (DMs) are distinguished: 1) the markers ensuring text coherence, 2) the markers disclosing a speaker's attitude to an utterance, and 3) the markers reflecting the process of interaction between the author and the reader. This article is devoted to consideration of the second group DMs. Comparative analysis of using DMsdiscloses specific ways of presenting academic knowledge and the influence of ethnolinguistic models of academic discourse organization on this variety. Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.633 |