Bioethics: Negotiation of Fundamental Differences in Russian and US Curricula; Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences; Vol. 215 : International Education and Cross-Cultural Communication, Problems and Solutions, (IECC 2015)

Dades bibliogràfiques
Parent link:Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Vol. 215 : International Education and Cross-Cultural Communication, Problems and Solutions, (IECC 2015).— 2015.— [P. 26-31]
Autor principal: Rogotneva E. N. Elena Nikolaevna
Autor corporatiu: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ) Кафедра социальных коммуникаций (СК)
Altres autors: Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Irina Vigenovna, Goncharenko M. V. Mark Vasilievich
Sumari:Title screen
The primary purpose of the research reported in this article is to propose a methodological approach to the teaching of bioethics in Russia. The American practice of teaching bioethics was chosen as a reference considering their extensive experience of teaching bioethics in medical universities. The conceptual information process model was used to perform interdisciplinary research on the problem. The conceptual information process model enabled us to adopt the American bioethics curriculum in accordance with Russian traditions of medical education. A new bioethics curriculum is proposed based on this model. The information process model not only reveals the mechanism of social self-organization, but also gives a methodological “clue” for creating a cross-disciplinary curriculum. This curriculum will permit researchers to access, negotiate and overcome fundamental differences between Russia and the USA in the teaching of bioethics.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
Idioma:anglès
Publicat: 2015
Matèries:
Accés en línia:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.569
http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/33639
Format: Electrònic Capítol de llibre
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=649842

MARC

LEADER 00000nla2a2200000 4500
001 649842
005 20231224112407.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\15012 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\14211 
090 |a 649842 
100 |a 20160826a2015 k y0engy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
105 |a y z 100zy 
135 |a drgn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Bioethics: Negotiation of Fundamental Differences in Russian and US Curricula  |f E. N. Rogotneva, I. V. Melik-Gaykazyan, M. V. Goncharenko 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: р. 31 (7 tit.)] 
330 |a The primary purpose of the research reported in this article is to propose a methodological approach to the teaching of bioethics in Russia. The American practice of teaching bioethics was chosen as a reference considering their extensive experience of teaching bioethics in medical universities. The conceptual information process model was used to perform interdisciplinary research on the problem. The conceptual information process model enabled us to adopt the American bioethics curriculum in accordance with Russian traditions of medical education. A new bioethics curriculum is proposed based on this model. The information process model not only reveals the mechanism of social self-organization, but also gives a methodological “clue” for creating a cross-disciplinary curriculum. This curriculum will permit researchers to access, negotiate and overcome fundamental differences between Russia and the USA in the teaching of bioethics. 
333 |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса 
461 0 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\2898  |t Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 
463 0 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\14998  |t Vol. 215 : International Education and Cross-Cultural Communication, Problems and Solutions, (IECC 2015)  |o International Conference, 9-11 June 2015, Tomsk, Russia  |o [proceedings]  |f National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU) ; ed. E. V. Fell  |v [P. 26-31]  |d 2015 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a биоэтика 
610 1 |a методологический подход 
610 1 |a Россия 
610 1 |a США 
610 1 |a медицинские исследования 
700 1 |a Rogotneva  |b E. N.  |c Sociologist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of philosophical sciences  |f 1976-  |g Elena Nikolaevna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33824  |9 17418 
701 1 |a Melik-Gaykazyan  |b I. V.  |g Irina Vigenovna 
701 1 |a Goncharenko  |b M. V.  |c specialist in the field of psychology and pedagogy  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences  |f 1973-  |g Mark Vasilievich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33597 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ)  |b Кафедра социальных коммуникаций (СК)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\21254 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20170120  |g RCR 
856 4 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.569 
856 4 |u http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/33639 
942 |c CF