A Value-based Approach to Unspelling Entrepreneurship; SHS Web of Conferences; Vol. 28 : Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences (RPTSS 2015)

Bibliographic Details
Parent link:SHS Web of Conferences
Vol. 28 : Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences (RPTSS 2015).— 2016.— [01117, 6 p.]
Main Author: Baryshev A. A. Aleksey Andreevich
Corporate Author: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ) Кафедра экономики (ЭКОН)
Other Authors: Barysheva G. A. Galina Anzelmovna
Summary:Title screen
Entrepreneurship and the entrepreneur figure are social phenomena subjected to constant mutations. Extant definitions of entrepreneurship are always based on current characteristics of entrepreneur activity and, as a rule, absolutize them as essential. In the article main mystifications of entrepreneurship are analyzed due to the fact that it is attributed general properties of entrepreneurial activity in the way they are understood in a certain historical period. The paper suggests a way out of the succession of mystifications by rejecting the entrepreneurship definition in the frame of a subject-object interpretive scheme and the development of the entrepreneur activity concept as a kind of social activity. The social action theory and the theory of social objects fetishization are the methodological research foundation. The results of the research are the following. First, the interpretation of the entrepreneur and entrepreneurship on the basis of personal traits, functions and ways of the construction of the future are mystifications ascribing the monopoly on arising and developing human action characteristics in different historical periods to entrepreneurship. Second, the cause of mystifications is the transfer of the human action analysis according to the scheme «subject-process-object » to the research of entrepreneurship. Third, attempts to overcome mystifications while preserving the naturalistic approach result in the multiplication of entrepreneurial mystifications as the reflection of new arising general characteristics of human action. Fourth, a general approach to the definition of the entrepreneurial action as a kind of the social action, which has sense in the value production and is capable of everlasting enrichment with new modus of actions and created values, is suggested. Perspectives of further research include the investigation of synchronic and diachronic peculiarities of entrepreneurial action modus and produced values.
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162801117
http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/33150
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=649658

MARC

LEADER 00000nla2a2200000 4500
001 649658
005 20231220141317.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\14820 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\14819 
090 |a 649658 
100 |a 20160801a2016 k y0engy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
105 |a y z 100zy 
135 |a drgn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a A Value-based Approach to Unspelling Entrepreneurship  |f A. A. Baryshev, G. A. Barysheva 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: 26 tit.] 
330 |a Entrepreneurship and the entrepreneur figure are social phenomena subjected to constant mutations. Extant definitions of entrepreneurship are always based on current characteristics of entrepreneur activity and, as a rule, absolutize them as essential. In the article main mystifications of entrepreneurship are analyzed due to the fact that it is attributed general properties of entrepreneurial activity in the way they are understood in a certain historical period. The paper suggests a way out of the succession of mystifications by rejecting the entrepreneurship definition in the frame of a subject-object interpretive scheme and the development of the entrepreneur activity concept as a kind of social activity. The social action theory and the theory of social objects fetishization are the methodological research foundation. The results of the research are the following. First, the interpretation of the entrepreneur and entrepreneurship on the basis of personal traits, functions and ways of the construction of the future are mystifications ascribing the monopoly on arising and developing human action characteristics in different historical periods to entrepreneurship. Second, the cause of mystifications is the transfer of the human action analysis according to the scheme «subject-process-object » to the research of entrepreneurship. Third, attempts to overcome mystifications while preserving the naturalistic approach result in the multiplication of entrepreneurial mystifications as the reflection of new arising general characteristics of human action. Fourth, a general approach to the definition of the entrepreneurial action as a kind of the social action, which has sense in the value production and is capable of everlasting enrichment with new modus of actions and created values, is suggested. Perspectives of further research include the investigation of synchronic and diachronic peculiarities of entrepreneurial action modus and produced values. 
461 0 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\14324  |t SHS Web of Conferences 
463 0 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\14326  |t Vol. 28 : Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences (RPTSS 2015)  |o International Conference, December 15-17, 2015, Tomsk, Russia  |o [proceedings]  |f National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU) ; eds. I. B. Ardashkin ; N. V. Martyushev  |v [01117, 6 p.]  |d 2016 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a предпринимательство 
610 1 |a предпринимательская деятельность 
610 1 |a социальная деятельность 
610 1 |a предприниматели 
610 1 |a мистификации 
700 1 |a Baryshev  |b A. A.  |c economist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, candidate of economic sciences  |f 1960-  |g Aleksey Andreevich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\36423 
701 1 |a Barysheva  |b G. A.  |c Economist  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of economic sciences (DSc)   |f 1961-  |g Galina Anzelmovna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\30398  |9 14741 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ)  |b Кафедра экономики (ЭКОН)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18375 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20170120  |g RCR 
856 4 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162801117 
856 4 |u http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/33150 
942 |c CF