Sea surface temperature and salinity product comparison against external in situ data in the Arctic Ocean; Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans; Vol. 120, iss. 11

Dades bibliogràfiques
Parent link:Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans.— , 1980-
Vol. 120, iss. 11.— 2015.— [P. 7223-7236]
Autor corporatiu: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Институт природных ресурсов Кафедра геологии и разведки полезных ископаемых Международная научно-образовательная лаборатория изучения углерода арктических морей
Altres autors: Stroh J., Panteleev G. G. Gleb Glebovich, Kirillov S. A. Sergey A., Makhotin M. S. Mikhail S., Shakhova N. E. Nataljya Evgenjevna
Sumari:Title screen
Sea-surface temperature and salinity (SST/S) in the Arctic Ocean (AO) are largely governed by sea-ice and continental runoff rather than evaporation and precipitation as in lower latitude oceans, and global satellite analyses and models which incorporate remotely observed SST/S may be inaccurate in the AO due to lack of direct measurements for calibrating satellite data. For this reason, we are motivated to validate several satellite sea-surface temperature (SST) data products and SST/S models by comparing gridded data in the AO with oceanographic records from 2006 to 2013. Statistical analysis of product-minus-observation differences reveals that the satellite SST products considered have a temperature bias magnitude of less than 0.5 inline imageC compared to ship-based CTD measurements, and most of these biases are negative in sign. SST/S models also show an overall negative temperature bias, but no common sign or magnitude of salinity bias against CTD data. Ice tethered profiler (ITP) near-surface data span the seasons of several years, and these measurements reflect a sea-ice dominated region where the ocean surface cannot be remotely observed. Against this data, many of the considered models and products show large errors with detectable seasonal differences in SST bias. Possible sources of these errors are discussed, and two adjustments of product SST on the basis of sea-ice concentration are suggested for reducing bias to within less than 0.01 inline imageC of ITP near-surface temperatures.
Idioma:anglès
Publicat: 2015
Matèries:
Accés en línia:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011005
Format: Electrònic Capítol de llibre
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=649647

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 649647
005 20250306141609.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\14809 
090 |a 649647 
100 |a 20160729d2015 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a US 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Sea surface temperature and salinity product comparison against external in situ data in the Arctic Ocean  |f J. Stroh [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: 84 tit.] 
330 |a Sea-surface temperature and salinity (SST/S) in the Arctic Ocean (AO) are largely governed by sea-ice and continental runoff rather than evaporation and precipitation as in lower latitude oceans, and global satellite analyses and models which incorporate remotely observed SST/S may be inaccurate in the AO due to lack of direct measurements for calibrating satellite data. For this reason, we are motivated to validate several satellite sea-surface temperature (SST) data products and SST/S models by comparing gridded data in the AO with oceanographic records from 2006 to 2013. Statistical analysis of product-minus-observation differences reveals that the satellite SST products considered have a temperature bias magnitude of less than 0.5 inline imageC compared to ship-based CTD measurements, and most of these biases are negative in sign. SST/S models also show an overall negative temperature bias, but no common sign or magnitude of salinity bias against CTD data. Ice tethered profiler (ITP) near-surface data span the seasons of several years, and these measurements reflect a sea-ice dominated region where the ocean surface cannot be remotely observed. Against this data, many of the considered models and products show large errors with detectable seasonal differences in SST bias. Possible sources of these errors are discussed, and two adjustments of product SST on the basis of sea-ice concentration are suggested for reducing bias to within less than 0.01 inline imageC of ITP near-surface temperatures. 
461 |t Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans  |d 1980- 
463 |t Vol. 120, iss. 11  |v [P. 7223-7236]  |d 2015 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
701 1 |a Stroh  |b J. 
701 1 |a Panteleev  |b G. G.  |g Gleb Glebovich 
701 1 |a Kirillov  |b S. A.  |g Sergey A. 
701 1 |a Makhotin  |b M. S.  |g Mikhail S. 
701 1 |a Shakhova  |b N. E.  |c geologist  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, doctor of geological-mineralogical Sciences  |f 1959-  |g Nataljya Evgenjevna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\35374  |9 18599 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Институт природных ресурсов  |b Кафедра геологии и разведки полезных ископаемых  |b Международная научно-образовательная лаборатория изучения углерода арктических морей  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\20711  |9 27810 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20161020  |g RCR 
856 4 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011005 
942 |c CF