Critical Thinking as a Cognitive Educational Technology; SHS Web of Conferences; Vol. 28 : Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences (RPTSS 2015)

Detalles Bibliográficos
Parent link:SHS Web of Conferences
Vol. 28 : Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences (RPTSS 2015).— 2016.— [01018, 4 p.]
Autores Corporativos: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ) Кафедра истории и философии науки и техники (ИФНТ), Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ) Кафедра иностранных языков (ИЯСГТ), Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт природных ресурсов (ИПР) Кафедра бурения скважин (БС)
Otros Autores: Brylina I. V. Irina Vladimirovna, Turchevskaya B. K. Bella, Bogoryad N. V. Nataliya Vladimirovna, Brylin V. I. Vladimir Ivanovich, Chaplinskaya Ya. I. Yana Igorevna
Sumario:Title screen
The article deals with higher education issues related to the formation of students’ intellectual work skills. The research objective of the paper was to consider critical thinking as a cognitive technology in education. In this regard, the didactic and structural approaches to the study of critical thinking do not contradict one another: each approach is a logical complement of the other and reveals certain aspects of the complex concept of critical thinking, giving emphasis to the argument, which is a tool, used both in critical and dogmatic thinking. By the general competence we mean principles of thinking, the ability to produce a reasoned piece of oral and written language, understanding and analysis of philosophical issues, considering the essence and value of the information. Among the professional competencies, the following should be listed: the ability to reconsider the gathered experience critically, the ability to collect, process, and interpret the data of modern research, to form judgments about the value and impact of the professional activity. The logical competence draws focused attention to the critical argument, regarding it throughout the course Logic. It is concluded that critical thinking can be seen as a cognitive educational technology for the formation of logical competence.
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162801018
http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/33061
Formato: Electrónico Capítulo de libro
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=649551

MARC

LEADER 00000nla2a2200000 4500
001 649551
005 20240125120427.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\14713 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\14711 
090 |a 649551 
100 |a 20160727a2016 k y0engy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
105 |a y z 100zy 
135 |a drgn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Critical Thinking as a Cognitive Educational Technology  |f I. V. Brylina [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: 16 tit.] 
330 |a The article deals with higher education issues related to the formation of students’ intellectual work skills. The research objective of the paper was to consider critical thinking as a cognitive technology in education. In this regard, the didactic and structural approaches to the study of critical thinking do not contradict one another: each approach is a logical complement of the other and reveals certain aspects of the complex concept of critical thinking, giving emphasis to the argument, which is a tool, used both in critical and dogmatic thinking. By the general competence we mean principles of thinking, the ability to produce a reasoned piece of oral and written language, understanding and analysis of philosophical issues, considering the essence and value of the information. Among the professional competencies, the following should be listed: the ability to reconsider the gathered experience critically, the ability to collect, process, and interpret the data of modern research, to form judgments about the value and impact of the professional activity. The logical competence draws focused attention to the critical argument, regarding it throughout the course Logic. It is concluded that critical thinking can be seen as a cognitive educational technology for the formation of logical competence. 
461 0 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\14324  |t SHS Web of Conferences 
463 0 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\14326  |t Vol. 28 : Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences (RPTSS 2015)  |o International Conference, December 15-17, 2015, Tomsk, Russia  |o [proceedings]  |f National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU) ; eds. I. B. Ardashkin ; N. V. Martyushev  |v [01018, 4 p.]  |d 2016 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a критическое мышление 
610 1 |a образовательные технологии 
610 1 |a студенты 
610 1 |a компетентность 
610 1 |a высшее образование 
701 1 |a Brylina  |b I. V.  |c philosopher  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of Philosophy  |f 1967-  |g Irina Vladimirovna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33600  |9 17258 
701 1 |a Turchevskaya  |b B. K.  |g Bella 
701 1 |a Bogoryad  |b N. V.  |c linguist  |c Senior Lecturer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1977-  |g Nataliya Vladimirovna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33170 
701 1 |a Brylin  |b V. I.  |c mining engineer  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of technical sciences  |f 1940-  |g Vladimir Ivanovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\32822 
701 1 |a Chaplinskaya  |b Ya. I.  |c economist  |c junior researcher of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1992-  |g Yana Igorevna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\42082 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ)  |b Кафедра истории и философии науки и техники (ИФНТ)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\21252 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ)  |b Кафедра иностранных языков (ИЯСГТ)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18376 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Институт природных ресурсов (ИПР)  |b Кафедра бурения скважин (БС)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18666 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20181026  |g RCR 
856 4 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162801018 
856 4 |u http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/33061 
942 |c CF