Methods for land use impact assessment: A review; Environmental Impact Assessment Review; Vol. 60

Podrobná bibliografie
Parent link:Environmental Impact Assessment Review: scientific journal
Vol. 60.— 2016.— [P. 64–74]
Korporativní autor: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Институт природных ресурсов Кафедра геоэкологии и геохимии
Další autoři: Perminova T. A. Tatjyana Anatoljevna, Sirina N. V. Nataljya Viktorovna, Laratte B. Bertrand, Baranovskaya N. V. Nataliya Vladimirovna, Rikhvanov L. P. Leonid Petrovich
Shrnutí:Title screen
Many types of methods to assess land use impact have been developed. Nevertheless a systematic synthesis of all these approaches is necessary to highlight the most commonly used and most effective methods. Given the growing interest in this area of research, a review of the different methods of assessing land use impact (LUI) was performed using bibliometric analysis. One hundred eighty seven articles of agricultural and biological science, and environmental sciences were examined. According to our results, the most frequently used land use assessment methods are Life-Cycle Assessment, Material Flow Analysis/Input–Output Analysis, Environmental Impact Assessment and Ecological Footprint. Comparison of the methods allowed their specific features to be identified and to arrive at the conclusion that a combination of several methods is the best basis for a comprehensive analysis of land use impact assessment.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: 2016
Témata:
On-line přístup:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.02.002
Médium: Elektronický zdroj Kapitola
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=649458

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 649458
005 20250305144117.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\14620 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\14566 
090 |a 649458 
100 |a 20160715d2016 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a RU 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Methods for land use impact assessment: A review  |f T. A. Perminova [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: p. 73-74 (78 tit.)] 
330 |a Many types of methods to assess land use impact have been developed. Nevertheless a systematic synthesis of all these approaches is necessary to highlight the most commonly used and most effective methods. Given the growing interest in this area of research, a review of the different methods of assessing land use impact (LUI) was performed using bibliometric analysis. One hundred eighty seven articles of agricultural and biological science, and environmental sciences were examined. According to our results, the most frequently used land use assessment methods are Life-Cycle Assessment, Material Flow Analysis/Input–Output Analysis, Environmental Impact Assessment and Ecological Footprint. Comparison of the methods allowed their specific features to be identified and to arrive at the conclusion that a combination of several methods is the best basis for a comprehensive analysis of land use impact assessment. 
333 |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса 
461 |t Environmental Impact Assessment Review  |o scientific journal 
463 |t Vol. 60  |v [P. 64–74]  |d 2016 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a землепользование 
701 1 |a Perminova  |b T. A.  |g Tatjyana Anatoljevna 
701 1 |a Sirina  |b N. V.  |g Nataljya Viktorovna 
701 1 |a Laratte  |b B.  |g Bertrand 
701 1 |a Baranovskaya  |b N. V.  |c geochemist  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of biological sciences  |f 1970-  |g Nataliya Vladimirovna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31010  |9 15240 
701 1 |a Rikhvanov  |b L. P.  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |c Doctor of geological- mineralogical sciences  |c Honored geologist of Russia  |c Honored Worker of higher professional education of the Russian Federation  |f 1945-2020  |g Leonid Petrovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\25922  |9 11773 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Институт природных ресурсов  |b Кафедра геоэкологии и геохимии  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18658  |9 27111 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20180401  |g RCR 
856 4 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.02.002 
942 |c CF