KTM Tokamak Operation Scenarios Software Infrastructure; Nuclear Engineering and Technology; Vol. 46, iss. 5

Manylion Llyfryddiaeth
Parent link:Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Vol. 46, iss. 5.— 2014.— [P. 667-674]
Awdur Corfforaethol: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет
Awduron Eraill: Pavlov V. M. Vadim Mikhailovich, Baystrukov K. I. Konstantin Ivanovich, Golobokov Yu. N. Yury Nikolaevich, Ovchinnikov A. V. Anton Viktorovich, Lee A. M. Aleksey Mikhailovich, Tazhibaeva I. L. Irina Lashkarovna, Shapovalov G. V. Gennady Voadimirovich, Merkulov S. V. Stepan Vadimovich, Mezentsev A. A. Anton Alekseevich
Crynodeb:Title screen
One of the largest problems for tokamak devices such as Kazakhstan Tokamak for Material Testing (KTM) is the operation scenarios' development and execution. Operation scenarios may be varied often, so a convenient hardware and software solution is required for scenario management and execution. Dozens of diagnostic and control subsystems with numerous configuration settings may be used in an experiment, so it is required to automate the subsystem configuration process to coordinate changes of the related settings and to prevent errors. Most of the diagnostic and control subsystems software at KTM was unified using an extra software layer, describing the hardware abstraction interface. The experiment sequence was described using a command language.The whole infrastructure was brought together by a universal communication protocol supporting various media, including Ethernet and serial links. The operation sequence execution infrastructure was used at KTM to carry out plasma experiments.
Iaith:Saesneg
Cyhoeddwyd: 2014
Pynciau:
Mynediad Ar-lein:http://dx.doi.org/10.5516/NET.04.2014.012
Fformat: Electronig Pennod Llyfr
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=649247

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 649247
005 20260319115736.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\14409 
090 |a 649247 
100 |a 20160627d2014 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a US 
135 |a drnn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a KTM Tokamak Operation Scenarios Software Infrastructure  |f V. M. Pavlov [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: p. 674 (8 tit.)] 
330 |a One of the largest problems for tokamak devices such as Kazakhstan Tokamak for Material Testing (KTM) is the operation scenarios' development and execution. Operation scenarios may be varied often, so a convenient hardware and software solution is required for scenario management and execution. Dozens of diagnostic and control subsystems with numerous configuration settings may be used in an experiment, so it is required to automate the subsystem configuration process to coordinate changes of the related settings and to prevent errors. Most of the diagnostic and control subsystems software at KTM was unified using an extra software layer, describing the hardware abstraction interface. The experiment sequence was described using a command language.The whole infrastructure was brought together by a universal communication protocol supporting various media, including Ethernet and serial links. The operation sequence execution infrastructure was used at KTM to carry out plasma experiments. 
461 |t Nuclear Engineering and Technology 
463 |t Vol. 46, iss. 5  |v [P. 667-674]  |d 2014 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a токамак КТМ 
610 1 |a автоматическое управление 
610 1 |a программное обеспечение 
701 1 |a Pavlov  |b V. M.  |c specialist in the field of automation equipment and electronics  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of technical sciences  |f 1965-  |g Vadim Mikhailovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31224  |9 15419 
701 1 |a Baystrukov  |b K. I.  |c physicist  |c Senior Lecturer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1966-  |g Konstantin Ivanovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\36972  |9 19989 
701 1 |a Golobokov  |b Yu. N.  |c specialist in the field of nuclear engineering  |c engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1982-  |g Yury Nikolaevich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\36798  |9 19827 
701 1 |a Ovchinnikov  |b A. V.  |g Anton Viktorovich 
701 1 |a Lee  |b A. M.  |c Specialist in the field of informatics and computer technology  |c Programmer of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Postgraduate  |f 1986-  |g Aleksey Mikhailovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\37140  |9 20133 
701 1 |a Tazhibaeva  |b I. L.  |g Irina Lashkarovna 
701 1 |a Shapovalov  |b G. V.  |g Gennady Voadimirovich 
701 1 |a Merkulov  |b S. V.  |c Specialist in the field of automation equipment and electronics  |c Design Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University  |f 1977-  |g Stepan Vadimovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\37141  |9 20134 
701 1 |a Mezentsev  |b A. A.  |c Specialist in the field of automation equipment and electronics  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Technical Sciences  |f 1984-  |g Anton Alekseevich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\37142  |9 20135 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |c (2009- )  |9 26305 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20160829  |g RCR 
856 4 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.5516/NET.04.2014.012 
942 |c CF