Two-photon exchange contribution to elastic electron–proton scattering: measurements at the VEPP-3 storage ring

Bibliographic Details
Parent link:Physica Scripta
Vol. 166.— 2015.— [014017, 5 p.]
Corporate Authors: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Физико-технический институт Научный отдел, Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет Физико-технический институт Кафедра экспериментальной физики
Other Authors: Rachek I. A. Igor Anatoljevich, Arrington J., Dmitriev V. F. Vladimir Fedorovich, Gauzshteyn (Gauzshtein) V. V. Vyacheslav Valerjevich, Gramolin A. F. Alexander Valeryevich, Holt R. J., Kaminsky V. V. Vyacheslav Viktorovich, Lazarenko V. A. Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich, Mishnev S. I. Svyatoslav Igorevich, Muchnoy N. Yu. Nikolay Yurjevich, Neyfeld V. V. Valery Valentinovich, Nikolenko D. M. Dmitry Mitrofanovich, Sadykov R. Sh. Rustam Shagitovich, Shestakov Yu. V. Yury Vladimirovich, Stibunov V. N. Victor Nikolaevich
Summary:Title screen
A striking discrepancy between the results for the ratio of electric and magnetic form factors of the proton obtained by two approaches: the Rosenbluth extraction from the unpolarized cross section and the double-polarization measurements has led to a serious re-examination of the role played by two-photon exchange diagrams. The evaluation of such diagrams could not be done in model-independent way, which means an experimental verification is required. One of the direct ways to do this is to measure the ratio of positron–proton and electron–proton elastic scattering cross-sections for identical kinematics. Such a measurement has been performed at the VEPP-3 storage ring at Novosibirsk. There were two runs at beam energies of 1.6 and 1.0 GeV at several ranges of scattering angle. The measurements covered the transferred momentum Q2 up to 1.5 GeV2 and the virtual photon polarization parameter epsilon down to 0.2 . The VEPP-3 experimental approach is described and the results of the measurements are presented.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/2015/T166/014017
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=648459

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 648459
005 20250221125301.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\13616 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\6049 
090 |a 648459 
100 |a 20160520d2015 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a GB 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Two-photon exchange contribution to elastic electron–proton scattering: measurements at the VEPP-3 storage ring  |f I. A. Rachek, J. Arrington, V. F. Dmitriev [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
330 |a A striking discrepancy between the results for the ratio of electric and magnetic form factors of the proton obtained by two approaches: the Rosenbluth extraction from the unpolarized cross section and the double-polarization measurements has led to a serious re-examination of the role played by two-photon exchange diagrams. The evaluation of such diagrams could not be done in model-independent way, which means an experimental verification is required. One of the direct ways to do this is to measure the ratio of positron–proton and electron–proton elastic scattering cross-sections for identical kinematics. Such a measurement has been performed at the VEPP-3 storage ring at Novosibirsk. There were two runs at beam energies of 1.6 and 1.0 GeV at several ranges of scattering angle. The measurements covered the transferred momentum Q2 up to 1.5 GeV2 and the virtual photon polarization parameter epsilon down to 0.2 . The VEPP-3 experimental approach is described and the results of the measurements are presented. 
333 |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса 
461 |t Physica Scripta 
463 |t Vol. 166  |v [014017, 5 p.]  |d 2015 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
701 1 |a Rachek  |b I. A.  |g Igor Anatoljevich 
701 1 |a Arrington  |b J. 
701 1 |a Dmitriev  |b V. F.  |g Vladimir Fedorovich 
701 1 |a Gauzshteyn (Gauzshtein)  |b V. V.  |c specialist in the field of nuclear engineering  |c Researcher, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences  |f 1983-  |g Vyacheslav Valerjevich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\35050  |9 18325 
701 1 |a Gramolin  |b A. F.  |g Alexander Valeryevich 
701 1 |a Holt  |b R. J. 
701 1 |a Kaminsky  |b V. V.  |g Vyacheslav Viktorovich 
701 1 |a Lazarenko  |b V. A.  |g Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich 
701 1 |a Mishnev  |b S. I.  |g Svyatoslav Igorevich 
701 1 |a Muchnoy  |b N. Yu.  |g Nikolay Yurjevich 
701 1 |a Neyfeld  |b V. V.  |g Valery Valentinovich 
701 1 |a Nikolenko  |b D. M.  |g Dmitry Mitrofanovich 
701 1 |a Sadykov  |b R. Sh.  |g Rustam Shagitovich 
701 1 |a Shestakov  |b Yu. V.  |g Yury Vladimirovich 
701 1 |a Stibunov  |b V. N.  |c Head of the laboratory of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of physical and mathematical science  |c Russian nuclear physicist  |f 1943-  |g Victor Nikolaevich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31002  |9 15232 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Физико-технический институт  |b Научный отдел  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\21283  |9 27972 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |b Физико-технический институт  |b Кафедра экспериментальной физики  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\21255  |9 27946 
801 1 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20140916 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20200720  |g RCR 
856 4 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/2015/T166/014017 
942 |c CF