New technologies in treatment of atrial fibrillation in cardiosurgical patients; AIP Conference Proceedings; Vol. 1688 : New Operational Technologies

New technologies in treatment of atrial fibrillation in cardiosurgical patients; AIP Conference Proceedings; Vol. 1688 : New Operational Technologies

Bibliographic Details
Parent link:AIP Conference Proceedings
Vol. 1688 : New Operational Technologies.— 2015.— [030008, 2 p.]
Corporate Author: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Физико-технический институт (ФТИ) Кафедра иностранных языков физико-технического института (ИЯФТ)
Other Authors: Evtushenko A. V. Aleksey Valerjevich, Evtushenko V. V. Vladimir Valerjevich, Bykov A. N. Aleksandr Nikolaevich, Sergeev V. S. Vladimir Sergeevich, Syryamkin V. I. Vladimir Ivanovich, Kistenev Yu. V. Yury Vladimirovich, Anfinogenova Ya. J. Yana Jonovna, Smyshlyaev K. A. Konstantin Alekseevich, Kurlov I. O. Igor Olegovich
Summary:Title screen
The article is devoted to the evaluation of the results of clinical application of penetrating radiofrequency ablation techniques on atrial myocardium. Total operated on 241 patients with valvular heart disease and coronary heart disease complicated with atrial fibrillation. All operations were performed under cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegia. The main group consists of 141 patients which were operated using penetrating technique radiofrequency exposure. The control group consisted of 100 patients who underwent surgery with the use of “classical” monopolar RF-ablation technique. Both groups were not significantly different on all counts before surgery. Patients with previous heart surgery were excluded during the selection of candidates for the procedure, due to the presence of adhesions in the pericardium, that do not allow good visualization of left atrium, sufficient to perform this procedure. Penetrating technique has significantly higher efficiency compared to the “classic” technique in the early and long-term postoperative periods. In the early postoperative period, its efficiency is 93%, and in the long term is 88%. The efficacy of “classical” monopolar procedure is below: 86% and 68% respectively.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
электронный ресурс
труды учёных ТПУ
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4936003
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=648081

Similar Items

Similar Items