Comparative study of the radio-frequency magnetron sputter depositedCaP films fabricated onto acid-etched or pulsed electronbeam-treated titanium; Thin Solid Films; Vol. 571, pt. 1

書誌詳細
Parent link:Thin Solid Films.— , 1967-
Vol. 571, pt. 1.— 2014.— [P. 218–224]
その他の著者: Surmenev R. A. Roman Anatolievich, Tyurin A. I., Surmeneva M. A. Maria Alexandrovna, Mukhametkaliyev T. M., Teresov A. D., Koval N. N. Nikolay Nikolaevich, Pirozhkova T. S., Shuvarin I. A., Oehr C.
要約:Title screen
This study investigated the effect of the substrate morphology introduced by various substrate preparation techniques, namely acid etching (AE) and pulsed electron beam (PEB) treatments, on the CaP film morphology and mechanical properties. The morphology, nanohardness, and Young's modulus of the CaP coating deposited via radio-frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering were investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), atomic force microscope (AFM), scanning electron microscopy and nanoindentation studies. The Ca/P ratios of the CaP coating deposited via RF magnetron sputtering onto titanium substrates treated using AE and PEB according to XPS were 1.73 ± 0.03 and 1.72 ± 0.04, respectively, which is close to the Ca/P ratio of 1.67 typical for stoichiometric hydroxyapatite (HA). The AFM experiments and nanoindentation studies revealed significant differences in the morphology and mechanical responses of the CaP films deposited onto acid-etched titanium substrates treated with PEB. Deposition of the CaP coating onto the acid-etched surface resulted in a rough surface with the presence of an island-like morphology. The CaP coating onto a smooth titanium substrate treated by PEB exhibited grains with irregular shapes and decreased size. The nanoindentation hardness and the Young's modulus of the HA coating deposited onto titanium treated by the PEB treatment were determined to be 7.0 ± 0.3 and 124 ± 3 GPa, respectively, which are significantly higher than those of the CaP coating on the acid-etched titanium substrates. Moreover, the elastic strain to failure (H/E), the plastic deformation resistance (H3/E2), and the percent elastic recovery %R of the HA coating on titanium after surface irradiation with an electron energy density of 15 J·cm- 2 were determined to increase by ~ 23%, ~ 70% and ~ 53%, respectively, compared to the CaP coating on acid-etched titanium.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
言語:英語
出版事項: 2014
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2014.10.049
フォーマット: xMaterials 電子媒体 図書の章
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=647466

MARC

LEADER 00000naa0a2200000 4500
001 647466
005 20250212093329.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\12606 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\12605 
090 |a 647466 
100 |a 20160412d2014 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Comparative study of the radio-frequency magnetron sputter depositedCaP films fabricated onto acid-etched or pulsed electronbeam-treated titanium  |f R. A. Surmenev [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: p. 224 (49 tit.)] 
330 |a This study investigated the effect of the substrate morphology introduced by various substrate preparation techniques, namely acid etching (AE) and pulsed electron beam (PEB) treatments, on the CaP film morphology and mechanical properties. The morphology, nanohardness, and Young's modulus of the CaP coating deposited via radio-frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering were investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), atomic force microscope (AFM), scanning electron microscopy and nanoindentation studies. The Ca/P ratios of the CaP coating deposited via RF magnetron sputtering onto titanium substrates treated using AE and PEB according to XPS were 1.73 ± 0.03 and 1.72 ± 0.04, respectively, which is close to the Ca/P ratio of 1.67 typical for stoichiometric hydroxyapatite (HA). The AFM experiments and nanoindentation studies revealed significant differences in the morphology and mechanical responses of the CaP films deposited onto acid-etched titanium substrates treated with PEB. Deposition of the CaP coating onto the acid-etched surface resulted in a rough surface with the presence of an island-like morphology. The CaP coating onto a smooth titanium substrate treated by PEB exhibited grains with irregular shapes and decreased size. The nanoindentation hardness and the Young's modulus of the HA coating deposited onto titanium treated by the PEB treatment were determined to be 7.0 ± 0.3 and 124 ± 3 GPa, respectively, which are significantly higher than those of the CaP coating on the acid-etched titanium substrates. Moreover, the elastic strain to failure (H/E), the plastic deformation resistance (H3/E2), and the percent elastic recovery %R of the HA coating on titanium after surface irradiation with an electron energy density of 15 J·cm- 2 were determined to increase by ~ 23%, ~ 70% and ~ 53%, respectively, compared to the CaP coating on acid-etched titanium. 
333 |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса 
461 |t Thin Solid Films  |d 1967- 
463 |t Vol. 571, pt. 1  |v [P. 218–224]  |d 2014 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a electron beam treatment 
610 1 |a substrate preparation 
701 1 |a Surmenev  |b R. A.  |c physicist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Senior researcher, Candidate of physical and mathematical sciences  |f 1982-  |g Roman Anatolievich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31885  |9 15957 
701 1 |a Tyurin  |b A. I. 
701 1 |a Surmeneva  |b M. A.  |c specialist in the field of material science  |c engineer-researcher of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Associate Scientist  |f 1984-  |g Maria Alexandrovna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31894  |9 15966 
701 1 |a Mukhametkaliyev  |b T. M. 
701 1 |a Teresov  |b A. D. 
701 1 |a Koval  |b N. N.  |c specialist in the field of electronics  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of technical sciences  |f 1948-  |g Nikolay Nikolaevich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\34748  |9 18098 
701 1 |a Pirozhkova  |b T. S. 
701 1 |a Shuvarin  |b I. A. 
701 1 |a Oehr  |b C. 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20161215  |g RCR 
856 4 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2014.10.049 
942 |c CF