Социальная память в контексте историзма
| Parent link: | Вестник Томского государственного университета. История.— , 2007- № 1.— 2011.— [С. 158-161] |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Autor corporatiu: | |
| Altres autors: | |
| Sumari: | Заглавие с экрана Рассматривается проблема соотношения социальной и исторической памяти. Социальная память направлена на достижение ценностно-смыслового консенсуса, память историческая стремится сохранить и передать фактические знания о прошлом. Социальная память и память историческая, имея идентичный объект отражения, отличаются способами фиксации его содержания и формами отражения социального бытия In the paper the problem of social and historical memory correlation is stated. The correlation of real past, its preservation and adequate understanding by actual present is meant. Historical memory is conscious addressing to the past implying all the positive and negative sides. It is an attempt to restore the true character of the past events reflected in historical theory. Historical memory is a subject of research of historians who have the aim to reveal what was really happening during this or that historical event as well as it is a subject of research of philosophers who try to find out the main tendencies and meaning of historical development that are reflected in historical consciousness. As social memory covers a wide range of material kept in memory, it is less connected with the real carriers of its content and is less exposed to manipulation. Moreover, the process of social memory existence itself is realised in such forms of its existence which embrace deep essential characteristics of a society rooted in myths and archetypes. Historical memory appears as a reflection of a particular "order" for this or that reception of the past. It results in rerecording and revaluating of the historic past where its content is either consciously profaned or sublimated. Social memory is directed at reaching value and meaning consensus whereas historical memory is aimed at preserving and handing over real knowledge about the past. While having identical object of reflection both social and historical memory are different in terms of ways of its content recording and forms of social existence. The core systematically important aspect that brings together social and historical memory is a person (the mankind as a whole) who performs as a carrier of both historical and social memory. But a person combining some things of temporary and eternal, universal and particular character is constantly constructing his attitude to the world, and this ongoing creative dialogue can cause the appearance of social memory Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса |
| Publicat: |
2011
|
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16209949 |
| Format: | Electrònic Capítol de llibre |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=646550 |
| Sumari: | Заглавие с экрана Рассматривается проблема соотношения социальной и исторической памяти. Социальная память направлена на достижение ценностно-смыслового консенсуса, память историческая стремится сохранить и передать фактические знания о прошлом. Социальная память и память историческая, имея идентичный объект отражения, отличаются способами фиксации его содержания и формами отражения социального бытия In the paper the problem of social and historical memory correlation is stated. The correlation of real past, its preservation and adequate understanding by actual present is meant. Historical memory is conscious addressing to the past implying all the positive and negative sides. It is an attempt to restore the true character of the past events reflected in historical theory. Historical memory is a subject of research of historians who have the aim to reveal what was really happening during this or that historical event as well as it is a subject of research of philosophers who try to find out the main tendencies and meaning of historical development that are reflected in historical consciousness. As social memory covers a wide range of material kept in memory, it is less connected with the real carriers of its content and is less exposed to manipulation. Moreover, the process of social memory existence itself is realised in such forms of its existence which embrace deep essential characteristics of a society rooted in myths and archetypes. Historical memory appears as a reflection of a particular "order" for this or that reception of the past. It results in rerecording and revaluating of the historic past where its content is either consciously profaned or sublimated. Social memory is directed at reaching value and meaning consensus whereas historical memory is aimed at preserving and handing over real knowledge about the past. While having identical object of reflection both social and historical memory are different in terms of ways of its content recording and forms of social existence. The core systematically important aspect that brings together social and historical memory is a person (the mankind as a whole) who performs as a carrier of both historical and social memory. But a person combining some things of temporary and eternal, universal and particular character is constantly constructing his attitude to the world, and this ongoing creative dialogue can cause the appearance of social memory Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса |
|---|