About Wear and Average Surface Temperature of Copper or Steel Contacts at Sliding Current Collection

Bibliographic Details
Parent link:AIP Conference Proceedings
Vol. 1683 : Advanced Materials with Hierarchical Structure for New Technologies and Reliable Structures.— 2015.— [020051, 4 p.]
Main Author: Fadin V. V.
Corporate Author: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт физики высоких технологий (ИФВТ) Кафедра физики высоких технологий в машиностроении (ФВТМ)
Other Authors: Aleutdinova M. I., Rubtsov V. E. Valery Evgenjevich
Summary:Title screen
Wear intensity and the average surface temperature of contact between copper and 1020 steel in dry sliding with a contact density higher 100 A/cm2 are defined. It is shown that the temperature decreases linearly along the specimen with an increasing of distance from a contact surface. It is established that copper forms a friction zone with lower average contact surface temperature and with lower wear intensity in comparison with those of 1020 steel. It is caused by the lower local shear stability of copper comparing with that of 1020 steel. The explanation of this fact is offered on the basis of idea of low copper shear stability (i.e. copper high plasticity) that leads to easy relaxation of mechanical stresses in the field of stress concentrators. In this case, the surface layer is deformed locally at the low structural level and the low speed of structural defects formation is manifested. Rather high fatigue resistance of a surface layer takes place as a result. These factors and high heat conductivity of copper cause high shear stability of a surface layer at the macro-scale structural level that promotes weak heating and high wear resistance. Iron (unlike copper) has rather low heat conductivity and higher local shear stability. It leads to more difficult tension relaxation in a surface layer, as well as average temperature increasing and higher speed of deterioration.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4932741
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=644886

MARC

LEADER 00000nla2a2200000 4500
001 644886
005 20231101134334.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\9970 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\9969 
090 |a 644886 
100 |a 20151203a2015 k y0engy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
105 |a y z 100zy 
135 |a drgn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a About Wear and Average Surface Temperature of Copper or Steel Contacts at Sliding Current Collection  |f V. V. Fadin, M. I. Aleutdinova, V. E. Rubtsov 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: 9 tit.] 
330 |a Wear intensity and the average surface temperature of contact between copper and 1020 steel in dry sliding with a contact density higher 100 A/cm2 are defined. It is shown that the temperature decreases linearly along the specimen with an increasing of distance from a contact surface. It is established that copper forms a friction zone with lower average contact surface temperature and with lower wear intensity in comparison with those of 1020 steel. It is caused by the lower local shear stability of copper comparing with that of 1020 steel. The explanation of this fact is offered on the basis of idea of low copper shear stability (i.e. copper high plasticity) that leads to easy relaxation of mechanical stresses in the field of stress concentrators. In this case, the surface layer is deformed locally at the low structural level and the low speed of structural defects formation is manifested. Rather high fatigue resistance of a surface layer takes place as a result. These factors and high heat conductivity of copper cause high shear stability of a surface layer at the macro-scale structural level that promotes weak heating and high wear resistance. Iron (unlike copper) has rather low heat conductivity and higher local shear stability. It leads to more difficult tension relaxation in a surface layer, as well as average temperature increasing and higher speed of deterioration. 
333 |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса 
461 0 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\4816  |t AIP Conference Proceedings 
463 0 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\9779  |t Vol. 1683 : Advanced Materials with Hierarchical Structure for New Technologies and Reliable Structures  |o Proceedings of the International Conference, 21–25 September 2015, Tomsk, Russia  |f National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU) ; ed. V. E. Panin ; S. G. Psakhie ; V. M. Fomin  |v [020051, 4 p.]  |d 2015 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a износ 
610 1 |a температура 
610 1 |a поверхности 
610 1 |a медь 
610 1 |a контакты 
610 1 |a контактные поверхности 
610 1 |a поверхностные слои 
610 1 |a теплопроводность 
700 1 |a Fadin  |b V. V. 
701 1 |a Aleutdinova  |b M. I. 
701 1 |a Rubtsov  |b V. E.  |c physicist  |c engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University, candidate of physical and mathematical sciences  |f 1970-  |g Valery Evgenjevich  |2 stltpush  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\34118 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Институт физики высоких технологий (ИФВТ)  |b Кафедра физики высоких технологий в машиностроении (ФВТМ)  |h 2087  |2 stltpush  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18687 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20151203  |g RCR 
856 4 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4932741 
942 |c CF