Some Notes on the Leipzig–Jakarta List of the Chulym Language

Podrobná bibliografie
Parent link:Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Vol. 206 : Linguistic and Cultural Studies: Traditions and Innovations, LKTI.— 2015.— [P. 46-50]
Korporativní autor: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет
Další autoři: Novgorodov I. Innokentiy, Lemskaya V. M. Valeriya Mikhailovna, Gainutdinova A. Albina, Ishkildina L. Linara
Shrnutí:Title screen
Based on the analysis of the most resistant words (Leipzig–Jakarta list) of Chulym Turkic in comparison with those of the Oghuz and Kipchak languages, authors come to a conclusion that Chulym Turkic is more similar to the Kipchak Turkic languages than the Ohguz ones. The Chulym Turkic material for the analysis is field dialectological data. The words of other languages under study were taken from dictionaries. The comparative method was used as the main research method. Previously, Chulym Turkic was considered as one of the Siberian Turkic languages also including Khakass, Shor and Saryg-Yughur, to which the authors disagree.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: 2015
Témata:
On-line přístup:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.022
http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/15302
Médium: Elektronický zdroj Kapitola
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=644734

MARC

LEADER 00000nla2a2200000 4500
001 644734
005 20250522171246.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\9818 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\9814 
090 |a 644734 
100 |a 20151130a2015 k y0engy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
105 |a y z 100zy 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Some Notes on the Leipzig–Jakarta List of the Chulym Language  |f I. Novgorodov [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: р. 50 (11 tit.)] 
330 |a Based on the analysis of the most resistant words (Leipzig–Jakarta list) of Chulym Turkic in comparison with those of the Oghuz and Kipchak languages, authors come to a conclusion that Chulym Turkic is more similar to the Kipchak Turkic languages than the Ohguz ones. The Chulym Turkic material for the analysis is field dialectological data. The words of other languages under study were taken from dictionaries. The comparative method was used as the main research method. Previously, Chulym Turkic was considered as one of the Siberian Turkic languages also including Khakass, Shor and Saryg-Yughur, to which the authors disagree. 
333 |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса 
461 0 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\2898  |t Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 
463 0 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\9691  |t Vol. 206 : Linguistic and Cultural Studies: Traditions and Innovations, LKTI  |o XVth International Conference, 9-11 November, 2015, Tomsk, Russia  |o [proceedings]  |v [P. 46-50]  |d 2015 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a устойчивые словосочетания 
610 1 |a тюркские языки 
701 1 |a Novgorodov  |b I.  |g Innokentiy 
701 1 |a Lemskaya  |b V. M.  |c linguist  |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, candidate of philological sciences  |f 1983-  |g Valeriya Mikhailovna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\34838 
701 1 |a Gainutdinova  |b A.  |g Albina 
701 1 |a Ishkildina  |b L.  |g Linara 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет  |c (2009- )  |9 26305 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20161122  |g RCR 
850 |a 63413507 
856 4 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.022 
856 4 |u http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/15302 
942 |c CF