Some Notes on the Leipzig–Jakarta List of the Chulym Language; Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences; Vol. 206 : Linguistic and Cultural Studies: Traditions and Innovations, LKTI
| Parent link: | Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Vol. 206 : Linguistic and Cultural Studies: Traditions and Innovations, LKTI.— 2015.— [P. 46-50] |
|---|---|
| Collectivité auteur: | |
| Autres auteurs: | , , , |
| Résumé: | Title screen Based on the analysis of the most resistant words (Leipzig–Jakarta list) of Chulym Turkic in comparison with those of the Oghuz and Kipchak languages, authors come to a conclusion that Chulym Turkic is more similar to the Kipchak Turkic languages than the Ohguz ones. The Chulym Turkic material for the analysis is field dialectological data. The words of other languages under study were taken from dictionaries. The comparative method was used as the main research method. Previously, Chulym Turkic was considered as one of the Siberian Turkic languages also including Khakass, Shor and Saryg-Yughur, to which the authors disagree. Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса |
| Langue: | anglais |
| Publié: |
2015
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.022 http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/15302 |
| Format: | Électronique Chapitre de livre |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=644734 |
| Résumé: | Title screen Based on the analysis of the most resistant words (Leipzig–Jakarta list) of Chulym Turkic in comparison with those of the Oghuz and Kipchak languages, authors come to a conclusion that Chulym Turkic is more similar to the Kipchak Turkic languages than the Ohguz ones. The Chulym Turkic material for the analysis is field dialectological data. The words of other languages under study were taken from dictionaries. The comparative method was used as the main research method. Previously, Chulym Turkic was considered as one of the Siberian Turkic languages also including Khakass, Shor and Saryg-Yughur, to which the authors disagree. Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.022 |