On dynamical realizations of l-conformal Galilei and Newton–Hooke algebras
| Parent link: | Nuclear Physics B: Scientific Journal.— , 1956- Vol. 896.— 2015.— [P. 244–254] |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Corporate Author: | |
| Other Authors: | |
| Summary: | Title screen In two recent papers (Aizawa et al., 2013 [15]) and (Aizawa et al., 2015 [16]), representation theory ofthe centrally extended l-conformal Galilei algebra with half-integer l has been applied so as to constructsecond order differential equations exhibiting the corresponding group as kinematical symmetry. It wassuggested to treat them as the Schrodinger equations which involve Hamiltonians describing dynamicalsystems without higher derivatives. The Hamiltonians possess two unusual features, however. First, theyinvolve the standard kinetic term only for one degree of freedom, while the remaining variables providecontributions linear in momenta. This is typical for Ostrogradsky’s canonical approach to the description ofhigher derivative systems. Second, the Hamiltonian in the second paper is not Hermitian in the conventionalsense. In this work, we study the classical limit of the quantum Hamiltonians and demonstrate that the firstof them is equivalent to the Hamiltonian describing free higher derivative nonrelativistic particles, whilethe second can be linked to the Pais–Uhlenbeck oscillator whose frequencies form the arithmetic sequence?k = (2k ? 1), k = 1,..., n. We also confront the higher derivative models with a genuine second ordersystem constructed in our recent work (Galajinsky and Masterov, 2013 [5]) which is discussed in detailfor l = 32 . |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/35968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2015.04.024 |
| Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=644111 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nla0a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 644111 | ||
| 005 | 20250304141451.0 | ||
| 035 | |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\9160 | ||
| 090 | |a 644111 | ||
| 100 | |a 20151028d2015 k||u0rusy50 ba | ||
| 101 | 1 | |a eng | |
| 102 | |a NL | ||
| 135 | |a drcn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | |a i | |
| 182 | 0 | |a b | |
| 200 | 1 | |a On dynamical realizations of l-conformal Galilei and Newton–Hooke algebras |f A. V. Galajinsky, I. V. Masterov | |
| 203 | |a Text |c electronic | ||
| 300 | |a Title screen | ||
| 320 | |a [References: p. 253-254 (17 tit.)] | ||
| 330 | |a In two recent papers (Aizawa et al., 2013 [15]) and (Aizawa et al., 2015 [16]), representation theory ofthe centrally extended l-conformal Galilei algebra with half-integer l has been applied so as to constructsecond order differential equations exhibiting the corresponding group as kinematical symmetry. It wassuggested to treat them as the Schrodinger equations which involve Hamiltonians describing dynamicalsystems without higher derivatives. The Hamiltonians possess two unusual features, however. First, theyinvolve the standard kinetic term only for one degree of freedom, while the remaining variables providecontributions linear in momenta. This is typical for Ostrogradsky’s canonical approach to the description ofhigher derivative systems. Second, the Hamiltonian in the second paper is not Hermitian in the conventionalsense. In this work, we study the classical limit of the quantum Hamiltonians and demonstrate that the firstof them is equivalent to the Hamiltonian describing free higher derivative nonrelativistic particles, whilethe second can be linked to the Pais–Uhlenbeck oscillator whose frequencies form the arithmetic sequence?k = (2k ? 1), k = 1,..., n. We also confront the higher derivative models with a genuine second ordersystem constructed in our recent work (Galajinsky and Masterov, 2013 [5]) which is discussed in detailfor l = 32 . | ||
| 461 | |t Nuclear Physics B |o Scientific Journal |d 1956- | ||
| 463 | |t Vol. 896 |v [P. 244–254] |d 2015 | ||
| 610 | 1 | |a труды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | |a электронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a алгебра Галилея | |
| 610 | 1 | |a дифференциальные уравнения второго порядка | |
| 610 | 1 | |a уравнение Шредингера | |
| 610 | 1 | |a гамильтонианы | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Galajinsky |b A. V. |c Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU), Department of Higher Mathematics and Mathematical Physics of the Institute of Physics and Technology (HMMPD IPT) |c Professor of the TPU |f 1971- |g Anton Vladimirovich |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\27878 |9 12894 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Masterov |b I. V. |c physicist |c research engineer, Senior Lecturer of Tomsk Polytechnic University, candidate of physico-mathematical Sciences |f 1987- |g Ivan Viktorovich |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\35458 |9 18655 | |
| 712 | 0 | 2 | |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) |b Физико-технический институт (ФТИ) |b Кафедра высшей математики и математической физики (ВММФ) |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18727 |
| 801 | 2 | |a RU |b 63413507 |c 20170112 |g RCR | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/35968 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2015.04.024 |
| 942 | |c CF | ||