GDGT distributions on the East Siberian Arctic Shelf: implications for organic carbon export, burial and degradation; Biogeosciences; Vol. 12

Dades bibliogràfiques
Parent link:Biogeosciences
Vol. 12.— 2015.— [P. 3753–3768]
Autor corporatiu: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт природных ресурсов (ИПР) Кафедра геологии и разведки полезных ископаемых (ГРПИ), Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт природных ресурсов (ИПР) Кафедра геологии и разведки полезных ископаемых (ГРПИ) Международная научно-образовательная лаборатория изучения углерода арктических морей (МНОЛ ИУАМ)
Altres autors: Sparkes R. B., Selver A. D., Bischoff J., Talbot H. M., Gustafsson O., Semiletov I. P. Igor Petrovich, Dudarev O. V. Oleg Viktorovich, Dongen B. E. van
Sumari:Title screen
Siberian permafrost contains a globally significant pool of organic carbon (OC) that is vulnerable to enhanced warming and subsequent release into the contemporary carbon cycle. OC release by both fluvial and coastal erosion has been reported in the region, but the behaviour of this material in the Arctic Ocean is insufficiently understood. The balance between OC deposition and degradation on the East Siberian Arctic Shelf (ESAS) influences the climate-carbon cycle feedback in this area. In this study we couple measurements of glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGTs) with bulk geochemical observations to improve knowledge of the sources of OC to the ESAS, the behaviour of specific biomarkers on the shelf and the balance between delivery and removal of different carbon pools. Branched GDGT (brGDGT) concentrations were highest close to river mouths, yet low in “ice complex” permafrost deposits, supporting recent observations that brGDGTs are mostly delivered by fluvial erosion, and may be a tracer for this in complex sedimentary environments. BrGDGT concentrations and the branched and isoprenoidal tetraether (BIT) index reduced quickly offshore, demonstrating a rapid reduction in river in- fluence. Stable carbon isotope ratios changed at a different rate to the BIT index, suggesting not only that OC on the shelf is sourced from fluvial erosion but also that erosion of coastal sediments delivers substantial quantities of OC to the Arctic Ocean. A model of OC export from fluvial, coastal and marine sources is able to recreate the biomarker and bulk observations and provide estimates for the influence of fluvial and coastal OC across the whole shelf. The model shows that coastal erosion delivers 43 % of the OC and 87 % of the mineral sediment to the ESAS, but that rivers deliver 72 % of brGDGTs, indicating that brGDGTs can be used as a proxy for river-derived sediment.
Idioma:anglès
Publicat: 2015
Matèries:
Accés en línia:http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3753-2015
Format: Electrònic Capítol de llibre
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=643205

MARC

LEADER 00000nla0a2200000 4500
001 643205
005 20250213163525.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\8193 
090 |a 643205 
100 |a 20150902d2015 k||y0rusy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a GDGT distributions on the East Siberian Arctic Shelf: implications for organic carbon export, burial and degradation  |f R. B. Sparkes [et al.] 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
330 |a Siberian permafrost contains a globally significant pool of organic carbon (OC) that is vulnerable to enhanced warming and subsequent release into the contemporary carbon cycle. OC release by both fluvial and coastal erosion has been reported in the region, but the behaviour of this material in the Arctic Ocean is insufficiently understood. The balance between OC deposition and degradation on the East Siberian Arctic Shelf (ESAS) influences the climate-carbon cycle feedback in this area. In this study we couple measurements of glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGTs) with bulk geochemical observations to improve knowledge of the sources of OC to the ESAS, the behaviour of specific biomarkers on the shelf and the balance between delivery and removal of different carbon pools. Branched GDGT (brGDGT) concentrations were highest close to river mouths, yet low in “ice complex” permafrost deposits, supporting recent observations that brGDGTs are mostly delivered by fluvial erosion, and may be a tracer for this in complex sedimentary environments. BrGDGT concentrations and the branched and isoprenoidal tetraether (BIT) index reduced quickly offshore, demonstrating a rapid reduction in river in- fluence. Stable carbon isotope ratios changed at a different rate to the BIT index, suggesting not only that OC on the shelf is sourced from fluvial erosion but also that erosion of coastal sediments delivers substantial quantities of OC to the Arctic Ocean. A model of OC export from fluvial, coastal and marine sources is able to recreate the biomarker and bulk observations and provide estimates for the influence of fluvial and coastal OC across the whole shelf. The model shows that coastal erosion delivers 43 % of the OC and 87 % of the mineral sediment to the ESAS, but that rivers deliver 72 % of brGDGTs, indicating that brGDGTs can be used as a proxy for river-derived sediment. 
461 |t Biogeosciences 
463 |t Vol. 12  |v [P. 3753–3768]  |d 2015 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
701 1 |a Sparkes  |b R. B. 
701 1 |a Selver  |b A. D. 
701 1 |a Bischoff  |b J. 
701 1 |a Talbot  |b H. M. 
701 1 |a Gustafsson  |b O. 
701 1 |a Semiletov  |b I. P.  |c geographer  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, doctor of geographical Sciences  |f 1955-  |g Igor Petrovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\34220 
701 1 |a Dudarev  |b O. V.  |c geologist  |c researcher of Tomsk Polytechnic University, candidate of geological and mineralogical Sciences  |f 1955-  |g Oleg Viktorovich  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\35379 
701 1 |a Dongen  |b B. E. van 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Институт природных ресурсов (ИПР)  |b Кафедра геологии и разведки полезных ископаемых (ГРПИ)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18660 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Институт природных ресурсов (ИПР)  |b Кафедра геологии и разведки полезных ископаемых (ГРПИ)  |b Международная научно-образовательная лаборатория изучения углерода арктических морей (МНОЛ ИУАМ)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\20711 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20170209  |g RCR 
856 4 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3753-2015 
942 |c CF