Роман В.В. Набокова "Подвиг" в контексте проблемы вымысла в критике русской эмиграции; Вестник Томского государственного университета; № 392
| Parent link: | Вестник Томского государственного университета/ Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет (ТГУ).— , 2007- № 392.— 2015.— [С. 5-14] |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autor: | |
| Korporativní autor: | |
| Shrnutí: | Заглавие с экрана Русские читатели, писатели и критики, оказавшись в эмиграции в начале 1920-х гг., были поставлены перед необходимостью переосмысления многих явлений отечественной словесности. За приятием или отторжением тех или иных произведений литературы стояло предпочтение традиционных для русской культуры XIX в. типов мимесиса и связанных с ними принципов построения сюжета большой прозаической формы. В.В. Набоков был одним из писателей, предпочитавших открытие новых миметических принципов и сюжетных форм. The first third of the 20th century for the culture of Russian emigration was the time of reflection, when the deep differences between European and Russian cultures and literatures became evident. Writers, critics, readers of the emigration literature not only felt nostalgia, but also compared the two cultural traditions, rejected foreign experience, mastered new ideas. Fantasy was one of the ideas which provoked discussions. As is well known, fiction is based on fantasy. But the understanding of fantasy in Russian and European cultures is different. The tradition of Christian literature of Ancient Russia interprets fantasy as a way to express the absolute truth. In the middle of the 19th century fantasy was interpreted as a way to show the facts of objective reality. Literature played the role of the moral judge for society. Free fantasy, play of imagination, pleasure of reading was on the background. European literature interpreted fantasy as a way to have on effect on the imagination of reading. The free play of imagination creates a new picture of the world, and the horizon of reading comprehension became more extensive. Literature depicts the world as unknown, unfinished, with relative senses. Russian readers and critics comprehended the absence of clear evaluation of reality, the relativity of facts and the truth in the fiction as something suspicious. It was the reason why early novels by V.V. Nabokov had negative criticism. Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса |
| Jazyk: | ruština |
| Vydáno: |
2015
|
| Témata: | |
| On-line přístup: | http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23162125 http://journals.tsu.ru/vestnik/&journal_page=archive&id=1179&article_id=20712 |
| Médium: | Elektronický zdroj Kapitola |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=641145 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa0a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 641145 | ||
| 005 | 20260715071704.0 | ||
| 035 | |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\6029 | ||
| 035 | |a RU\TPU\network\5982 | ||
| 090 | |a 641145 | ||
| 100 | |a 20150512d2015 k||y0rusy50 ca | ||
| 101 | 0 | |a rus | |
| 102 | |a RU | ||
| 135 | |a drcn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | |a i | |
| 182 | 0 | |a b | |
| 200 | 1 | |a Роман В.В. Набокова "Подвиг" в контексте проблемы вымысла в критике русской эмиграции |d V.V. Nabokov''s novel Glory in the context of the problem of fantasy in the criticism of Russian emigration |f Е. В. Антошина | |
| 203 | |a Текст |c электронный | ||
| 300 | |a Заглавие с экрана | ||
| 320 | |a [Библиогр.: с. 12-13 (22 назв.)] | ||
| 330 | |a Русские читатели, писатели и критики, оказавшись в эмиграции в начале 1920-х гг., были поставлены перед необходимостью переосмысления многих явлений отечественной словесности. За приятием или отторжением тех или иных произведений литературы стояло предпочтение традиционных для русской культуры XIX в. типов мимесиса и связанных с ними принципов построения сюжета большой прозаической формы. В.В. Набоков был одним из писателей, предпочитавших открытие новых миметических принципов и сюжетных форм. | ||
| 330 | |a The first third of the 20th century for the culture of Russian emigration was the time of reflection, when the deep differences between European and Russian cultures and literatures became evident. Writers, critics, readers of the emigration literature not only felt nostalgia, but also compared the two cultural traditions, rejected foreign experience, mastered new ideas. Fantasy was one of the ideas which provoked discussions. As is well known, fiction is based on fantasy. But the understanding of fantasy in Russian and European cultures is different. The tradition of Christian literature of Ancient Russia interprets fantasy as a way to express the absolute truth. In the middle of the 19th century fantasy was interpreted as a way to show the facts of objective reality. Literature played the role of the moral judge for society. Free fantasy, play of imagination, pleasure of reading was on the background. European literature interpreted fantasy as a way to have on effect on the imagination of reading. The free play of imagination creates a new picture of the world, and the horizon of reading comprehension became more extensive. Literature depicts the world as unknown, unfinished, with relative senses. Russian readers and critics comprehended the absence of clear evaluation of reality, the relativity of facts and the truth in the fiction as something suspicious. It was the reason why early novels by V.V. Nabokov had negative criticism. | ||
| 333 | |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса | ||
| 461 | |t Вестник Томского государственного университета |f Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет (ТГУ) |d 2007- | ||
| 463 | |t № 392 |v [С. 5-14] |d 2015 | ||
| 510 | 1 | |a V.V. Nabokov''s novel Glory in the context of the problem of fantasy in the criticism of Russian emigration |z eng | |
| 600 | 1 | |a Набоков |g Владимир Владимирович |f 1899-1977 |c российский и американский писатель, переводчик, литератеровед |b В. В. |2 stltpush |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\1120 | |
| 610 | 1 | |a электронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a труды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | |a русская культура | |
| 610 | 1 | |a критика | |
| 610 | 1 | |a русская эмиграция | |
| 610 | 1 | |a русская литература | |
| 610 | 1 | |a 20 век | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Антошина |b Е. В. |c лингвист |c доцентТомского политехнического университета, кандидат филологических наук |g Елена Васильевна |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\34506 |9 17889 | |
| 712 | 0 | 2 | |a Томский политехнический университет |c 1991- |7 ca |8 rus |9 26305 |
| 801 | 2 | |a RU |b 63413507 |c 20150512 |g RCR | |
| 856 | 4 | |u http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23162125 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://journals.tsu.ru/vestnik/&journal_page=archive&id=1179&article_id=20712 |
| 942 | |c CF | ||