От каббалы до «раскрещивания»: проблема осознанного выбора в современном и традиционном мистицизме
| Parent link: | Вестник Томского государственного университета. История/ Томский государственный университет (ТГУ).— , 2007- № 2 (34).— 2015.— [С. 115-119] |
|---|---|
| 第一著者: | |
| 団体著者: | |
| その他の著者: | |
| 要約: | Заглавие с экрана Анализируется проблема «ухода из официальной традиции» в классических и современных оккультных сообществах. Предполагается, что предпосылкой этого явления становится императив осознанного выбора в мистицизме. Эмпирической базой для исследования стал ряд примеров из известных восточных учений (каббалы, суфизма) и описания обрядов «раскрещива-ния» и «имянаречения» у славянских неоязычников. Основания для сравнения предлагается считать «ответами» мистических доктрин на вызовы ортодоксальных монотеистических религий, в которых в наибольшей степени проявился разрыв между социальным и сакральным миропорядком. The article is devoted to the problem of leaving the religious denomination in classical mysticism and modern occult communities. It is assumed that the desire of conscious choice and individualized mind of mystic derives from the "Axial age" in terms of German philosopher Karl Jaspers. Yet the empirical basis for this study was the medieval Kabbalah, eastern Sufism and modern Russian neo-pagan movements, which are outside the period. Although modern and traditional mysticism have a few differences caused by long chronological gap between them and cultural factors, there are some strong similarities in different forms of mysticism. Being aimed at self-bridging the gap between the sacred and the profane world Mystic makes a challenge to the religious tradition and social norms. At the same time his spiritual experience is different from the prophetic and magical approach. Exploration of the historical determinants of mystical experience could provide the better understanding of some processes occuring in new religious movements, e.g. the exclusion of orthodox Christianity in modern Russia. Mysticism has a mutual functional dependence with the situation of marginalization. Sometimes it radicalizes the religious practice and leads to the total negation of authorities or public destruction of symbols of faith described in the article. The purposes of the study were to examine the factors of making «conscious decision» by early and modern mystics and to determine what had influence on them. It is hypothesized that the actor of the decision-making in Jewish mysticism is «self-responsible» for his choice, while the Neo-pagans or Sufi are often led by irrational sense of the call of Nature or God. The question of the extent of freedom of modern «mystic» demands a particular consideration. Authors suggest that understanding of «sacred» and «profane» in Neo-paganism is different from the early traditions. «Sacred» is perceived as not something transcendental there, but as «social-like» (patrimonial, ancestral) category. Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса |
| 言語: | ロシア語 |
| 出版事項: |
2015
|
| 主題: | |
| オンライン･アクセス: | http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23278853 http://journals.tsu.ru/history/&journal_page=archive&id=1243&article_id=21438 |
| フォーマット: | 電子媒体 図書の章 |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=641008 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa0a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 641008 | ||
| 005 | 20250313114414.0 | ||
| 035 | |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\5886 | ||
| 090 | |a 641008 | ||
| 100 | |a 20150506d2015 k||y0rusy50 ca | ||
| 101 | 0 | |a rus | |
| 102 | |a RU | ||
| 135 | |a drcn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | |a i | |
| 182 | 0 | |a b | |
| 200 | 1 | |a От каббалы до «раскрещивания»: проблема осознанного выбора в современном и традиционном мистицизме |d From Jewish Kabbalah to Neopagan «disaffiliation»: the problem of conscious choice in modern and traditional mysticism |f К. А. Жарчинская, О. В. Хазанов | |
| 203 | |a Текст |c электронный | ||
| 300 | |a Заглавие с экрана | ||
| 320 | |a [Библиогр.: с. 119 (18 назв.)] | ||
| 330 | |a Анализируется проблема «ухода из официальной традиции» в классических и современных оккультных сообществах. Предполагается, что предпосылкой этого явления становится императив осознанного выбора в мистицизме. Эмпирической базой для исследования стал ряд примеров из известных восточных учений (каббалы, суфизма) и описания обрядов «раскрещива-ния» и «имянаречения» у славянских неоязычников. Основания для сравнения предлагается считать «ответами» мистических доктрин на вызовы ортодоксальных монотеистических религий, в которых в наибольшей степени проявился разрыв между социальным и сакральным миропорядком. | ||
| 330 | |a The article is devoted to the problem of leaving the religious denomination in classical mysticism and modern occult communities. It is assumed that the desire of conscious choice and individualized mind of mystic derives from the "Axial age" in terms of German philosopher Karl Jaspers. Yet the empirical basis for this study was the medieval Kabbalah, eastern Sufism and modern Russian neo-pagan movements, which are outside the period. Although modern and traditional mysticism have a few differences caused by long chronological gap between them and cultural factors, there are some strong similarities in different forms of mysticism. Being aimed at self-bridging the gap between the sacred and the profane world Mystic makes a challenge to the religious tradition and social norms. At the same time his spiritual experience is different from the prophetic and magical approach. Exploration of the historical determinants of mystical experience could provide the better understanding of some processes occuring in new religious movements, e.g. the exclusion of orthodox Christianity in modern Russia. Mysticism has a mutual functional dependence with the situation of marginalization. Sometimes it radicalizes the religious practice and leads to the total negation of authorities or public destruction of symbols of faith described in the article. The purposes of the study were to examine the factors of making «conscious decision» by early and modern mystics and to determine what had influence on them. It is hypothesized that the actor of the decision-making in Jewish mysticism is «self-responsible» for his choice, while the Neo-pagans or Sufi are often led by irrational sense of the call of Nature or God. The question of the extent of freedom of modern «mystic» demands a particular consideration. Authors suggest that understanding of «sacred» and «profane» in Neo-paganism is different from the early traditions. «Sacred» is perceived as not something transcendental there, but as «social-like» (patrimonial, ancestral) category. | ||
| 333 | |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса | ||
| 461 | |t Вестник Томского государственного университета. История |f Томский государственный университет (ТГУ) |d 2007- | ||
| 463 | |t № 2 (34) |v [С. 115-119] |d 2015 | ||
| 510 | 1 | |a From Jewish Kabbalah to Neopagan «disaffiliation»: the problem of conscious choice in modern and traditional mysticism |z eng | |
| 610 | 1 | |a электронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a труды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | |a мистицизм | |
| 610 | 1 | |a мистика | |
| 610 | 1 | |a неоязычество | |
| 610 | 1 | |a традиционализм | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Жарчинская |b К. А. |c историк |c ассистент Томского политехнического университета |f 1987- |g Ксения Александровна |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\34492 |9 17875 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Хазанов |b О. В. |g Олег Владимирович | |
| 712 | 0 | 2 | |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) |b Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ) |b Кафедра истории и регионоведения (ИСТ) |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18372 |
| 801 | 2 | |a RU |b 63413507 |c 20150506 |g RCR | |
| 856 | 4 | |u http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23278853 | |
| 856 | 4 | |u http://journals.tsu.ru/history/&journal_page=archive&id=1243&article_id=21438 | |
| 942 | |c CF | ||