Geological reasons causing rapid rate decline. A case study of Field T, Russia; IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; Vol. 24 : Scientific and Technical Challenges in the Well Drilling Progress, 24–27 November 2014, Tomsk, Russia
| Parent link: | IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science Vol. 24 : Scientific and Technical Challenges in the Well Drilling Progress, 24–27 November 2014, Tomsk, Russia.— 2015.— [012046, 14 p.] |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Autor corporatiu: | |
| Altres autors: | , |
| Sumari: | Title screen The paper introduces the complex approach to determining possible geological reasons causing rate decline in the wells of Field T, Russia. Therefore, possible geological reasons are sequentially considered and were divided into three main groups: 1) rate decline due to poorer reservoir quality; 2) rate decline due to facies lateral substitution; 3) rate decline due to active fault tectonics. The most appropriate facies models were constructed on the basis of all available data. Besides, in this study, core, well logging, seismic and well test data were integrated for the fullest reservoir characterization. The core from several recently drilled wells was described in detail to determine clue features. Further, seismic data were interpreted: structural interpretation, including faults and attribute analysis, was implemented. Appropriate electrofacies models were chosen as well. At the final stage, all previously-mentioned data were integrated with appropriate facies model construction. However, as it turned out later, the facies model was not the key factor affecting the rapid decline that appeared in some wells. It is suggested that very proximal faults can be a possible explanation. To confirm this suggestion, well test data were additionally used and both analytical and numerical methods were applied to show the consistency of this theory. Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса |
| Idioma: | anglès |
| Publicat: |
2015
|
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/24/1/012046 |
| Format: | MixedMaterials Electrònic Capítol de llibre |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=639773 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nla2a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 639773 | ||
| 005 | 20231101134100.0 | ||
| 035 | |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\4285 | ||
| 035 | |a RU\TPU\network\4282 | ||
| 090 | |a 639773 | ||
| 100 | |a 20150323a2015 k y0engy50 ba | ||
| 101 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 105 | |a y z 100zy | ||
| 135 | |a drcn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | |a i | |
| 182 | 0 | |a b | |
| 200 | 1 | |a Geological reasons causing rapid rate decline. A case study of Field T, Russia |f S. Kuzmin, V. S. Rukavishnikov, V. Sukovatyi | |
| 203 | |a Text |c electronic | ||
| 300 | |a Title screen | ||
| 320 | |a [References: 10 tit.] | ||
| 330 | |a The paper introduces the complex approach to determining possible geological reasons causing rate decline in the wells of Field T, Russia. Therefore, possible geological reasons are sequentially considered and were divided into three main groups: 1) rate decline due to poorer reservoir quality; 2) rate decline due to facies lateral substitution; 3) rate decline due to active fault tectonics. The most appropriate facies models were constructed on the basis of all available data. Besides, in this study, core, well logging, seismic and well test data were integrated for the fullest reservoir characterization. The core from several recently drilled wells was described in detail to determine clue features. Further, seismic data were interpreted: structural interpretation, including faults and attribute analysis, was implemented. Appropriate electrofacies models were chosen as well. At the final stage, all previously-mentioned data were integrated with appropriate facies model construction. However, as it turned out later, the facies model was not the key factor affecting the rapid decline that appeared in some wells. It is suggested that very proximal faults can be a possible explanation. To confirm this suggestion, well test data were additionally used and both analytical and numerical methods were applied to show the consistency of this theory. | ||
| 333 | |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса | ||
| 461 | 0 | |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\2499 |t IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science | |
| 463 | 0 | |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\4016 |t Vol. 24 : Scientific and Technical Challenges in the Well Drilling Progress, 24–27 November 2014, Tomsk, Russia |o [proceedings] |f National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU) |v [012046, 14 p.] |d 2015 | |
| 610 | 1 | |a электронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a труды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | |a геологические причины | |
| 610 | 1 | |a скорость | |
| 610 | 1 | |a пласты | |
| 610 | 1 | |a сейсмические данные | |
| 610 | 1 | |a скважины | |
| 610 | 1 | |a бурение | |
| 610 | 1 | |a численные методы | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kuzmin |b S. | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Rukavishnikov |b V. S. |c specialist in the field of oil and gas business |c Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University |f 1984- |g Valeriy Sergeevich |2 stltpush |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\34050 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Sukovatyi |b V. | |
| 712 | 0 | 2 | |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) |b Институт природных ресурсов (ИПР) |b Центр подготовки и переподготовки специалистов нефтегазового дела (ЦППС НД) |b Лаборатория геологии месторождений нефти и газа (ЛГМНГ) |h 5263 |2 stltpush |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\19125 |
| 801 | 2 | |a RU |b 63413507 |c 20161226 |g RCR | |
| 856 | 4 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/24/1/012046 | |
| 942 | |c CF | ||