Socio-technocratic Discourse of Technoscience; Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences; Vol. 166 : Proceedings of The International Conference on Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences 2014 (RPTSS-2014), 16–18 October 2014, Tomsk, Russia
| Parent link: | Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Vol. 166 : Proceedings of The International Conference on Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences 2014 (RPTSS-2014), 16–18 October 2014, Tomsk, Russia.— 2015.— [P. 511-515] |
|---|---|
| Hovedforfatter: | |
| Institution som forfatter: | |
| Andre forfattere: | |
| Summary: | Title screen The paper is focused on specific features of social science development on new stage defined as postnonclassical paradigm of social sciences. Specific features of knowledge acquiring and development in postnonclassical paradigm of social sciences are revealed. It is highlighted that postnonclassical paradigm of scientificity correlates with the stage called “technoscience”. It is proved that in frames of the present system of scientific knowledge classification (classical, nonclassical and postnonclassical scientific paradigms) that includes natural, social and technical sciences, technoscience cannot be referred to any of these types of knowledge. Technoscience represents new concept of knowledge production, new socio-technocratic discourse. The specific character of technoscience is in the fact that its objects are not objective reality in Cartesian dualistic worldview, but so called “human-dimension” objects. New stage of integration of science and society is characterized by new methodology of transdisciplinary research. Transdisciplinary research in comparison with interdisciplinary are distinguished by gateway to life practice; it is socially allocated production of knowledge. Knowledge is produced not only in context of inventions and fundamental rationales, but as well in context of assessment of application consequences (social assessment of technology). In is highlighted that technoscience refers to activity in frames of which science and technology make a sort of mixture or hybrid. Technoscience can be interpreted as specifically contemporary phenomenon, social technology in its own way. Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса |
| Sprog: | engelsk |
| Udgivet: |
2015
|
| Fag: | |
| Online adgang: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.563 http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/35438 |
| Format: | Electronisk Book Chapter |
| KOHA link: | https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=638866 |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nla2a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 638866 | ||
| 005 | 20231101134031.0 | ||
| 035 | |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\3263 | ||
| 090 | |a 638866 | ||
| 100 | |a 20150216a2015 k y0engy50 ba | ||
| 101 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 105 | |a y z 100zy | ||
| 135 | |a drcn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | |a i | |
| 182 | 0 | |a b | |
| 200 | 1 | |a Socio-technocratic Discourse of Technoscience |f I. V. Chernikova, D. V. Chernikova | |
| 203 | |a Text |c electronic | ||
| 300 | |a Title screen | ||
| 320 | |a [References: р. 515 (18 tit.)] | ||
| 330 | |a The paper is focused on specific features of social science development on new stage defined as postnonclassical paradigm of social sciences. Specific features of knowledge acquiring and development in postnonclassical paradigm of social sciences are revealed. It is highlighted that postnonclassical paradigm of scientificity correlates with the stage called “technoscience”. It is proved that in frames of the present system of scientific knowledge classification (classical, nonclassical and postnonclassical scientific paradigms) that includes natural, social and technical sciences, technoscience cannot be referred to any of these types of knowledge. Technoscience represents new concept of knowledge production, new socio-technocratic discourse. The specific character of technoscience is in the fact that its objects are not objective reality in Cartesian dualistic worldview, but so called “human-dimension” objects. New stage of integration of science and society is characterized by new methodology of transdisciplinary research. Transdisciplinary research in comparison with interdisciplinary are distinguished by gateway to life practice; it is socially allocated production of knowledge. Knowledge is produced not only in context of inventions and fundamental rationales, but as well in context of assessment of application consequences (social assessment of technology). In is highlighted that technoscience refers to activity in frames of which science and technology make a sort of mixture or hybrid. Technoscience can be interpreted as specifically contemporary phenomenon, social technology in its own way. | ||
| 333 | |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса | ||
| 461 | 0 | |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\2898 |t Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences | |
| 463 | 0 | |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\2900 |t Vol. 166 : Proceedings of The International Conference on Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences 2014 (RPTSS-2014), 16–18 October 2014, Tomsk, Russia |f National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU) |v [P. 511-515] |d 2015 | |
| 610 | 1 | |a электронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | |a труды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | |a science | |
| 610 | 1 | |a society | |
| 610 | 1 | |a knowledge | |
| 610 | 1 | |a transdisciplinary research | |
| 610 | 1 | |a postnonclassical paradigm | |
| 610 | 1 | |a technoscience | |
| 610 | 1 | |a social technology | |
| 610 | 1 | |a наука | |
| 610 | 1 | |a общество | |
| 610 | 1 | |a знания | |
| 610 | 1 | |a междисциплинарные исследования | |
| 610 | 1 | |a технонаука | |
| 610 | 1 | |a социальные технологии | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chernikova |b I. V. |c specialist in the field of psychology and law |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of Philosophical Sciences |f 1953- |g Irina Vasilievna |2 stltpush |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33617 | |
| 701 | 1 | |a Chernikova |b D. V. |c specialist in the field of psychology |c Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences |f 1977- |g Darya Vasilievna |2 stltpush |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33616 | |
| 712 | 0 | 2 | |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) |b Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ) |b Кафедра социологии, психологии и права (СОЦ) |h 41 |2 stltpush |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18373 |
| 801 | 2 | |a RU |b 63413507 |c 20161227 |g RCR | |
| 856 | 4 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.563 | |
| 856 | 4 | |u http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/35438 | |
| 942 | |c CF | ||