Well-being: Subjective and Objective Aspects; Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences; Vol. 166 : Proceedings of The International Conference on Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences 2014 (RPTSS-2014), 16–18 October 2014, Tomsk, Russia

Podrobná bibliografie
Parent link:Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Vol. 166 : Proceedings of The International Conference on Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences 2014 (RPTSS-2014), 16–18 October 2014, Tomsk, Russia.— 2015.— [P. 36-42]
Hlavní autor: Alatartseva E.
Korporativní autor: Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ) Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ) Кафедра экономики (ЭКОН)
Další autoři: Barysheva G. A. Galina Anzelmovna
Shrnutí:Title screen
The subject of well-being has always excited human society. Various official and scientific research documents have sought to outline the design and content of well-being, but the specific definition depends on the conceptual approach employed: the process, system, or other aspect. The purpose of this research is to create an integrated, multi-component model that can ensure the continued well-being of modern man. The modern man can be defined with regard to two levels of well-being: internal (subjective) and external (objective). Inner well-being is seen as a human, spiritual well-being associated with one's personal characteristics and features. External well-being develops from the perspective of perception and one's evaluation of human society.
Each level consists of four key contextual attributes that together constitute well-being: 1) one's existence in accordance with their natural essence (in harmony with others and the environment); 2) an innate understanding of what is good for oneself, and the presence of the ability and willingness to achieve it; 3) one's the ability to realize their human potential and plan for life; 4) the creation of a society and empowering people to fulfill the above stated positions 1, 2, 3, and increase activity and awareness. Such specification of the category “well-being” gives us an opportunity to distinguish between personal well-being of an individual and social well-being of member of society and state. Only discoursing in the framework of such conceptually comprehensive logic, it is possible to derive the “formula” of the well-being of human and society.
Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: 2015
Témata:
On-line přístup:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.479
http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/35366
Médium: Elektronický zdroj Kapitola
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=638668

MARC

LEADER 00000nla2a2200000 4500
001 638668
005 20231220154215.0
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\3060 
035 |a RU\TPU\network\2986 
090 |a 638668 
100 |a 20150210a2015 k y0engy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
105 |a y z 100zy 
135 |a drcn ---uucaa 
181 0 |a i  
182 0 |a b 
200 1 |a Well-being: Subjective and Objective Aspects  |f E. Alatartseva, G. A. Barysheva 
203 |a Text  |c electronic 
300 |a Title screen 
320 |a [References: р. 42 (10 tit.)] 
330 |a The subject of well-being has always excited human society. Various official and scientific research documents have sought to outline the design and content of well-being, but the specific definition depends on the conceptual approach employed: the process, system, or other aspect. The purpose of this research is to create an integrated, multi-component model that can ensure the continued well-being of modern man. The modern man can be defined with regard to two levels of well-being: internal (subjective) and external (objective). Inner well-being is seen as a human, spiritual well-being associated with one's personal characteristics and features. External well-being develops from the perspective of perception and one's evaluation of human society. 
330 |a Each level consists of four key contextual attributes that together constitute well-being: 1) one's existence in accordance with their natural essence (in harmony with others and the environment); 2) an innate understanding of what is good for oneself, and the presence of the ability and willingness to achieve it; 3) one's the ability to realize their human potential and plan for life; 4) the creation of a society and empowering people to fulfill the above stated positions 1, 2, 3, and increase activity and awareness. Such specification of the category “well-being” gives us an opportunity to distinguish between personal well-being of an individual and social well-being of member of society and state. Only discoursing in the framework of such conceptually comprehensive logic, it is possible to derive the “formula” of the well-being of human and society. 
333 |a Режим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса 
461 0 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\2898  |t Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 
463 0 |0 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\2900  |t Vol. 166 : Proceedings of The International Conference on Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences 2014 (RPTSS-2014), 16–18 October 2014, Tomsk, Russia  |f National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU)  |v [P. 36-42]  |d 2015 
610 1 |a электронный ресурс 
610 1 |a труды учёных ТПУ 
610 1 |a subjective well-being 
610 1 |a Ill-being 
610 1 |a sustainable development 
610 1 |a human development 
610 1 |a human society 
610 1 |a socio-economic aspects 
610 1 |a moral-psychological aspects 
610 1 |a субъективное благополучие 
610 1 |a устойчивое развитие 
610 1 |a человеческое общество 
610 1 |a социально-экономические аспекты 
610 1 |a благосостояние 
700 1 |a Alatartseva  |b E. 
701 1 |a Barysheva  |b G. A.  |c Economist  |c Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of economic sciences (DSc)   |f 1961-  |g Galina Anzelmovna  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\30398  |9 14741 
712 0 2 |a Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)  |b Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ)  |b Кафедра экономики (ЭКОН)  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18375 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20161227  |g RCR 
856 4 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.479 
856 4 |u http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/35366 
942 |c CF