Real Science. What it is, and what it Means

書誌詳細
第一著者: Ziman J. John
要約:Scientists and 'anti-scientists' alike need a more realistic image of science. The traditional mode of research, academic science, is not just a 'method': it is a distinctive culture, whose members win esteem and employment by making public their findings. Fierce competition for credibility is strictly regulated by established practices such as peer review. Highly specialized international communities of independent experts form spontaneously and generate the type of knowledge we call 'scientific' - systematic, theoretical, empirically tested, quantitative, and so on. Ziman shows that these familiar, 'philosophical' features of scientific knowledge are inseparable from the ordinary cognitive capabilities and peculiar social relationships of its producers. This wide-angled close-up of the natural and human sciences recognizes their unique value, whilst revealing the limits of their rationality, reliability, and universal applicability. It also shows how, for better or worse, the new 'post-academic' research culture of teamwork, accountability, etc. is changing these supposedly eternal philosophical characteristics.
言語:英語
出版事項: Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002
主題:
フォーマット: 図書
KOHA link:https://koha.lib.tpu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=209097

MARC

LEADER 00000nam0a2200000 4500
001 209097
005 20231101225518.0
010 |a 0521893100 
035 |a (RuTPU)RU\TPU\book\228406 
090 |a 209097 
100 |a 20120209d2002 k y0engy50 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a GB 
105 |a y z 001zy 
200 1 |a Real Science. What it is, and what it Means  |f J. Ziman 
210 |a Cambridge  |c Cambridge University Press  |d 2002 
215 |a 399 p.  |c il. 
320 |a Endnotes: p. 331-355. 
320 |a Bibliography: p.356-383. 
320 |a Index: p. 385-399. 
330 |a Scientists and 'anti-scientists' alike need a more realistic image of science. The traditional mode of research, academic science, is not just a 'method': it is a distinctive culture, whose members win esteem and employment by making public their findings. Fierce competition for credibility is strictly regulated by established practices such as peer review. Highly specialized international communities of independent experts form spontaneously and generate the type of knowledge we call 'scientific' - systematic, theoretical, empirically tested, quantitative, and so on. Ziman shows that these familiar, 'philosophical' features of scientific knowledge are inseparable from the ordinary cognitive capabilities and peculiar social relationships of its producers. This wide-angled close-up of the natural and human sciences recognizes their unique value, whilst revealing the limits of their rationality, reliability, and universal applicability. It also shows how, for better or worse, the new 'post-academic' research culture of teamwork, accountability, etc. is changing these supposedly eternal philosophical characteristics. 
606 1 |a Наука  |2 stltpush  |3 (RuTPU)RU\TPU\subj\45070  |9 64332 
610 1 |a научные гипотезы 
610 1 |a научные исследования 
610 1 |a научные открытия 
610 1 |a философские аспекты 
610 1 |a антинаука 
610 1 |a английский язык 
686 |a Ч21  |2 rubbk 
700 1 |a Ziman  |b J.  |g John 
801 1 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20120209 
801 2 |a RU  |b 63413507  |c 20120221  |g RCR 
942 |c BK